Find Center of Mass for Semicircular Wire

Slightly
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the center of mass of a semicircular wire. The wire is a semicircle, but the important thing to realize is that the wire is a closed loop. Think of a solid half disk, and just take the outer edge.
Where is the center of mass? This will be positioned with the center at the origin.
Radius b.

Homework Equations


cm = x1*m+x2*m/total mass

The Attempt at a Solution


What I tried to do was try to stay away from the integrals since there are just wires being used.
For the center of mass of x, it will be at zero because of symmetry.

For y, I used the equation above. With uniform density, the mass will factor out and I will just be left with lengths.

(2b*0 + Pi*b*2*b/Pi )/(2b + Pi*b)... is this right? or would you suggest that I use integrals.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Slightly said:

Homework Statement


Find the center of mass of a semicircular wire. The wire is a semicircle, but the important thing to realize is that the wire is a closed loop. Think of a solid half disk, and just take the outer edge.

Self-contradictory. Doesn't make sense. Draw a picture.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Here is the picture!
 

Attachments

  • nng.gif
    nng.gif
    4.3 KB · Views: 564
That makes sense. The wire is not a semi-circle, it is a semi-circle AND a connecting wire.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top