Find Common Difference of A.P. Given G.P. & Logarithms

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the common difference of an arithmetic progression (A.P.) formed by the logarithms of terms in a geometric progression (G.P.). Participants explore various computations and interpretations of the relationships between the logarithmic values.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a computation involving logarithms and seeks help to find the common difference of the A.P., claiming it to be $\frac{3}{2}$.
  • Another participant suggests an alternative solution leading to a common difference of $-\frac{5}{12}$ or $0$, questioning the correctness of the initial claim and suggesting a possible typo in the problem statement.
  • Subsequent replies clarify that the original question was miscopied, which may have contributed to the confusion regarding the common difference.
  • Further computations lead to a conclusion that if $a$, $b$, $c$ are in G.P., then the logarithmic values can be expressed in terms of each other, potentially leading to a constant A.P. with a common difference of $0$.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the computations and seeks clarification on a derived cubic equation involving logarithmic terms.
  • Another participant advises converting all logarithmic expressions to a common base to simplify the analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the common difference of the A.P., with some asserting it to be $\frac{3}{2}$ while others argue for $-\frac{5}{12}$ or $0$. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which value is correct, and there is no consensus on the final answer.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the assumptions made about the logarithmic expressions and the potential impact of the miscopied question on the computations. The relationship between the terms in G.P. and their logarithmic counterparts is complex and requires careful handling of definitions and conversions.

WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
378
Reaction score
30
If a,b, c, are in G.P and $\log_ba, \log_cb,\log_ac$ are in A.P. I want to find the common difference of A.P.

Answer:

After doing some computations, I stuck here. $\frac{2(\log a+\log r)}{\log a+2\log r}=\frac{2(\log a)^2+3\log r\log a +2(\log r)^2}{(\log a)^2+\log r\log a}$

How to proceed further? (a= 1st term in G.P. r= common ratio of G.P.)
Answer is $\frac32$. I don't understand how it is computed. If any member knowing further computations to arrive at the answer, may reply.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Dhamnekar Winod.

I got the answer $-\dfrac5{12}$ or $0$ (the latter being the trivial case $a=b=c$). Either the given answer is wrong or (which IMHO is the more likely) you made a typo copying the question.

Assuming you copied the question correctly, however, this is my solution.

If $a$,$b$,$c$ are in GP, then

$b\ =\ \sqrt{ac}$ (assuming $a,b,c$ are all positive, which appears to be what the question is doing)​

$\implies\ \log_ab\ =\ \dfrac{1+\log_ac}2$.

If $\log_ab$, $\log_cb$, $\log_ac$ are in AP, then
$$\log_cb\ =\ \frac{\log_ab}{\log_ac}\ =\ \frac{\log_ab+\log_ac}2$$
and substituing for $\log_ab$,
$$\frac{\frac{1+\log_ac}2}{\log_ac}\ =\ \frac{\frac{1+\log_ac}2+\log_ac}2$$
which becomes
$$3\left(\log_ac\right)^2-\log_ac-2\ =\ \left(3\log_ac+2\right)\left(\log_ac-1\right)\ =\ 0$$

$\implies\ \log_ac=-\dfrac23\ \text{or}\ 1$.

In the former case, $\log_ab=\dfrac16$ and $\log_cb=-\dfrac14$ – and you can check that
$$\frac16,\ -\frac14,\ -\frac23$$
is an AP with common difference $-\dfrac5{12}$.
 
Last edited:
Olinguito said:
Hi Dhamnekar Winod.

I got the answer $-\dfrac5{12}$ or $0$ (the latter being the trivial case $a=b=c$). Either the given answer is wrong or (which IMHO is the more likely) you made a typo copying the question.

Assuming you copied the question correctly, however, this is my solution.

If $a$,$b$,$c$ are in GP, then
$b\ =\ \sqrt{ac}$ (assuming $a,b,c$ are all positive, which appears to be what the question is doing)​

$\implies\ \log_ab\ =\ \dfrac{1+\log_ac}2$.

If $\log_ab$, $\log_cb$, $\log_ac$ are in AP, then
$$\log_cb\ =\ \frac{\log_ab}{\log_ac}\ =\ \frac{\log_ab+\log_ac}2$$
and substituing for $\log_ab$,
$$\frac{\frac{1+\log_ac}2}{\log_ac}\ =\ \frac{\frac{1+\log_ac}2+\log_ac}2$$
which becomes
$$3\left(\log_ac\right)^2-\log_ac-2\ =\ \left(3\log_ac+2\right)\left(\log_ac-1\right)\ =\ 0$$

$\implies\ \log_ac=-\dfrac23\ \text{or}\ 1$.

In the former case, $\log_ab=\dfrac16$ and $\log_cb=-\dfrac14$ – and you can check that
$$\frac16,\ -\frac14,\ -\frac23$$
is an AP with common difference $-\dfrac5{12}$.



Hello,
Your work is great. But i am sorry to say that the question posted was wrong. Please read $\log_ba$ instead of $\log_ab$.
 
Last edited:
Dhamnekar Winod said:
Please read $\log_ba$ instead of $\log_ab$.
Ah, sorry it was my fault. It was I who copied your question incorrectly. (Blush)

Now $a$, $b$, $c$ form a GP $\implies$ $b^2=ac$ $\implies$
$$2\log_cb\ =\ \log_ca+1.$$
If $\log_ba$, $\log_cb$, $\log_ac$ form an AP, then
$$2\log_cb\ =\ \log_ba+\log_ac$$
(note: $x$, $y$, $z$ form an AP $\implies$ $2y=x+z$); i.e.
$$2\log_cb\ =\ \frac{\log_ca}{\log_cb}+\frac1{\log_ca}$$
converting to base $c$.

However, substituting for $\log_ca$ or $\log_cb$ (working omitted) would give cubic equations simplifying to $\log_ca=\log_cb=1$, i.e. $a=b=c$, i.e.
$$\log_ba,\log_cb,\log_ac$$
is just $1,1,1$.

So I still don’t think the common difference is $\frac32$; it’s $0$ (i.e. a constant AP).
 
Olinguito said:
Ah, sorry it was my fault. It was I who copied your question incorrectly. (Blush)

Now $a$, $b$, $c$ form a GP $\implies$ $b^2=ac$ $\implies$
$$2\log_cb\ =\ \log_ca+1.$$
If $\log_ba$, $\log_cb$, $\log_ac$ form an AP, then
$$2\log_cb\ =\ \log_ba+\log_ac$$
(note: $x$, $y$, $z$ form an AP $\implies$ $2y=x+z$); i.e.
$$2\log_cb\ =\ \frac{\log_ca}{\log_cb}+\frac1{\log_ca}$$
converting to base $c$.

However, substituting for $\log_ca$ or $\log_cb$ (working omitted) would give cubic equations simplifying to $\log_ca=\log_cb=1$, i.e. $a=b=c$, i.e.
$$\log_ba,\log_cb,\log_ac$$
is just $1,1,1$.

So I still don’t think the common difference is $\frac32$; it’s $0$ (i.e. a constant AP).


Hello,

After some computations, I got $$4(\log_cb)^3-2(\log_cb)^2=2\log_ca\log_cb-\log_ca+\log_cb$$ How did you solve this?
 
Dhamnekar Winod said:
I got $$4(\log_cb)^3-2(\log_cb)^2=2\log_ca\log_cb-\log_ca+\log_cb$$

You have a mixture of $\log_ca$ and $\log_cb$. Try converting everything to $\log_ca$ or to $\log_cb$, using the relation $b^2=ac$.

Since $a$, $b$, $c$ form a GP, you have square of middle term = product of the other two terms. This applies to any three consecutive terms of any GP.

Thus
$$b^2=ac\ \implies\ 2\log_cb=\log_ca+1.$$
 
Olinguito said:
You have a mixture of $\log_ca$ and $\log_cb$. Try converting everything to $\log_ca$ or to $\log_cb$, using the relation $b^2=ac$.

Since $a$, $b$, $c$ form a GP, you have square of middle term = product of the other two terms. This applies to any three consecutive terms of any GP.

Thus
$$b^2=ac\ \implies\ 2\log_cb=\log_ca+1.$$
Hello,

Your answer is correct. $\frac32$ common difference of A.P is wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K