MHB Find Common Difference of A.P. Given G.P. & Logarithms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the common difference of an arithmetic progression (A.P.) formed by the logarithms of terms in a geometric progression (G.P.). The initial computations led to confusion regarding the correct interpretation of logarithmic expressions. After clarifying the terms, it was established that if \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\) are in G.P., then the logarithmic values can be expressed in terms of each other, leading to a cubic equation. The consensus is that the common difference of the A.P. is not \( \frac{3}{2} \) but rather \( 0 \), indicating that the logarithmic values are constant when \( a = b = c \). This conclusion emphasizes the importance of accurate notation and understanding of logarithmic relationships in solving such problems.
WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
376
Reaction score
28
If a,b, c, are in G.P and $\log_ba, \log_cb,\log_ac$ are in A.P. I want to find the common difference of A.P.

Answer:

After doing some computations, I stuck here. $\frac{2(\log a+\log r)}{\log a+2\log r}=\frac{2(\log a)^2+3\log r\log a +2(\log r)^2}{(\log a)^2+\log r\log a}$

How to proceed further? (a= 1st term in G.P. r= common ratio of G.P.)
Answer is $\frac32$. I don't understand how it is computed. If any member knowing further computations to arrive at the answer, may reply.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Dhamnekar Winod.

I got the answer $-\dfrac5{12}$ or $0$ (the latter being the trivial case $a=b=c$). Either the given answer is wrong or (which IMHO is the more likely) you made a typo copying the question.

Assuming you copied the question correctly, however, this is my solution.

If $a$,$b$,$c$ are in GP, then

$b\ =\ \sqrt{ac}$ (assuming $a,b,c$ are all positive, which appears to be what the question is doing)​

$\implies\ \log_ab\ =\ \dfrac{1+\log_ac}2$.

If $\log_ab$, $\log_cb$, $\log_ac$ are in AP, then
$$\log_cb\ =\ \frac{\log_ab}{\log_ac}\ =\ \frac{\log_ab+\log_ac}2$$
and substituing for $\log_ab$,
$$\frac{\frac{1+\log_ac}2}{\log_ac}\ =\ \frac{\frac{1+\log_ac}2+\log_ac}2$$
which becomes
$$3\left(\log_ac\right)^2-\log_ac-2\ =\ \left(3\log_ac+2\right)\left(\log_ac-1\right)\ =\ 0$$

$\implies\ \log_ac=-\dfrac23\ \text{or}\ 1$.

In the former case, $\log_ab=\dfrac16$ and $\log_cb=-\dfrac14$ – and you can check that
$$\frac16,\ -\frac14,\ -\frac23$$
is an AP with common difference $-\dfrac5{12}$.
 
Last edited:
Olinguito said:
Hi Dhamnekar Winod.

I got the answer $-\dfrac5{12}$ or $0$ (the latter being the trivial case $a=b=c$). Either the given answer is wrong or (which IMHO is the more likely) you made a typo copying the question.

Assuming you copied the question correctly, however, this is my solution.

If $a$,$b$,$c$ are in GP, then
$b\ =\ \sqrt{ac}$ (assuming $a,b,c$ are all positive, which appears to be what the question is doing)​

$\implies\ \log_ab\ =\ \dfrac{1+\log_ac}2$.

If $\log_ab$, $\log_cb$, $\log_ac$ are in AP, then
$$\log_cb\ =\ \frac{\log_ab}{\log_ac}\ =\ \frac{\log_ab+\log_ac}2$$
and substituing for $\log_ab$,
$$\frac{\frac{1+\log_ac}2}{\log_ac}\ =\ \frac{\frac{1+\log_ac}2+\log_ac}2$$
which becomes
$$3\left(\log_ac\right)^2-\log_ac-2\ =\ \left(3\log_ac+2\right)\left(\log_ac-1\right)\ =\ 0$$

$\implies\ \log_ac=-\dfrac23\ \text{or}\ 1$.

In the former case, $\log_ab=\dfrac16$ and $\log_cb=-\dfrac14$ – and you can check that
$$\frac16,\ -\frac14,\ -\frac23$$
is an AP with common difference $-\dfrac5{12}$.



Hello,
Your work is great. But i am sorry to say that the question posted was wrong. Please read $\log_ba$ instead of $\log_ab$.
 
Last edited:
Dhamnekar Winod said:
Please read $\log_ba$ instead of $\log_ab$.
Ah, sorry it was my fault. It was I who copied your question incorrectly. (Blush)

Now $a$, $b$, $c$ form a GP $\implies$ $b^2=ac$ $\implies$
$$2\log_cb\ =\ \log_ca+1.$$
If $\log_ba$, $\log_cb$, $\log_ac$ form an AP, then
$$2\log_cb\ =\ \log_ba+\log_ac$$
(note: $x$, $y$, $z$ form an AP $\implies$ $2y=x+z$); i.e.
$$2\log_cb\ =\ \frac{\log_ca}{\log_cb}+\frac1{\log_ca}$$
converting to base $c$.

However, substituting for $\log_ca$ or $\log_cb$ (working omitted) would give cubic equations simplifying to $\log_ca=\log_cb=1$, i.e. $a=b=c$, i.e.
$$\log_ba,\log_cb,\log_ac$$
is just $1,1,1$.

So I still don’t think the common difference is $\frac32$; it’s $0$ (i.e. a constant AP).
 
Olinguito said:
Ah, sorry it was my fault. It was I who copied your question incorrectly. (Blush)

Now $a$, $b$, $c$ form a GP $\implies$ $b^2=ac$ $\implies$
$$2\log_cb\ =\ \log_ca+1.$$
If $\log_ba$, $\log_cb$, $\log_ac$ form an AP, then
$$2\log_cb\ =\ \log_ba+\log_ac$$
(note: $x$, $y$, $z$ form an AP $\implies$ $2y=x+z$); i.e.
$$2\log_cb\ =\ \frac{\log_ca}{\log_cb}+\frac1{\log_ca}$$
converting to base $c$.

However, substituting for $\log_ca$ or $\log_cb$ (working omitted) would give cubic equations simplifying to $\log_ca=\log_cb=1$, i.e. $a=b=c$, i.e.
$$\log_ba,\log_cb,\log_ac$$
is just $1,1,1$.

So I still don’t think the common difference is $\frac32$; it’s $0$ (i.e. a constant AP).


Hello,

After some computations, I got $$4(\log_cb)^3-2(\log_cb)^2=2\log_ca\log_cb-\log_ca+\log_cb$$ How did you solve this?
 
Dhamnekar Winod said:
I got $$4(\log_cb)^3-2(\log_cb)^2=2\log_ca\log_cb-\log_ca+\log_cb$$

You have a mixture of $\log_ca$ and $\log_cb$. Try converting everything to $\log_ca$ or to $\log_cb$, using the relation $b^2=ac$.

Since $a$, $b$, $c$ form a GP, you have square of middle term = product of the other two terms. This applies to any three consecutive terms of any GP.

Thus
$$b^2=ac\ \implies\ 2\log_cb=\log_ca+1.$$
 
Olinguito said:
You have a mixture of $\log_ca$ and $\log_cb$. Try converting everything to $\log_ca$ or to $\log_cb$, using the relation $b^2=ac$.

Since $a$, $b$, $c$ form a GP, you have square of middle term = product of the other two terms. This applies to any three consecutive terms of any GP.

Thus
$$b^2=ac\ \implies\ 2\log_cb=\log_ca+1.$$
Hello,

Your answer is correct. $\frac32$ common difference of A.P is wrong.
 
Back
Top