Find Constraint Equation for Block on Wedge

  • Thread starter Thread starter PFuser1232
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Wedge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the constraint equation that relates the acceleration of a block on a wedge to the wedge's acceleration. The initial equation presented is $$h - y = (x - X) \tan{\theta}$$, with a consideration of redefining X to the center of mass of the wedge. It is clarified that if X is redefined, the equation must be adjusted accordingly to maintain consistency with the geometry of the situation. The participants agree that since X and the center of mass differ by a constant, their second derivatives will be equal, simplifying the trigonometric calculations. Ultimately, the choice of X was made to facilitate the trigonometric relationships involved.
PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
Suppose we want to find the constraint equation relating the acceleration of a block on a wedge to the acceleration of the wedge (see attached images). We can write:
$$h - y = (x - X) \tan{\theta}$$
What if ##X## was measured to the centre of mass of the wedge for instance? Wouldn't the correct equation be:
$$h - y = (X - x) \tan{\theta}$$
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    12 KB · Views: 602
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    10.2 KB · Views: 562
Physics news on Phys.org
MohammedRady97 said:
Suppose we want to find the constraint equation relating the acceleration of a block on a wedge to the acceleration of the wedge (see attached images). We can write:
$$h - y = (x - X) \tan{\theta}$$
I see how you got this and it makes sense.

MohammedRady97 said:
What if ##X## was measured to the centre of mass of the wedge for instance? Wouldn't the correct equation be:
$$h - y = (X - x) \tan{\theta}$$
I do not see how you got that. You still need the sides of the same triangle, you've just redefined what X is. So you need to rewrite your first equation using your new X. For example, if ## X_{cm} = X + a##, then your formula would become ##h - y = (x - X_{cm} + a) \tan{\theta}##.
 
Doc Al said:
I see how you got this and it makes sense.I do not see how you got that. You still need the sides of the same triangle, you've just redefined what X is. So you need to rewrite your first equation using your new X. For example, if ## X_{cm} = X + a##, then your formula would become ##h - y = (x - X_{cm} + a) \tan{\theta}##.

I just realized the error in my reasoning. This makes sense now. Since ##X## and ##X_{cm}## differ by a constant, their second derivatives should be equal. We chose ##X## to be the distance to the edge of the wedge to simplify the trigonometry required, right?
 
Last edited:
MohammedRady97 said:
We chose XX to be the distance to the edge of the wedge to simplify the trigonometry required, right?
Right.
 
  • Like
Likes PFuser1232
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top