Find delta-v; Hohmann transfer orbit

  • Thread starter Thread starter oddjobmj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta-v Orbit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity changes required for a space vehicle to transition from a circular orbit at 2RE to a circular orbit at 4RE using a Hohmann transfer orbit. The user initially calculated the required Δv1 and Δv2 but found their percentage representations incorrect. Key insights included recognizing that the velocity after the first change (at perigee) differs from the velocity before the second change (at apogee), necessitating the use of the semi-major axis for accurate calculations. Ultimately, the correct approach involves applying the velocity equation to the transfer orbit's characteristics, leading to the correct answers. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding orbital mechanics and the nuances of transfer orbits.
oddjobmj
Messages
305
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A space vehicle is in circular orbit about the earth. The mass of the vehicle is 3300 kg. The radius of the orbit is 2RE. It is desired to transfer the vehicle to a circular orbit of radius 4RE.

An efficient way to accomplish the transfer is to use a semielliptical orbit (known as a Hohmann transfer orbit), as shown. What velocity changes are required at the points of intersection, A and B? Express the change in speed as the percentage of the speed just before the change.

Unfortunately I am not given the figure that this problem refers to.

Homework Equations



Δv1=\sqrt{GM/r_1}(\sqrt{2r_2/(r_1+r_2)}-1)

Δv2=\sqrt{GM/r_2}(1-\sqrt{2r_1/(r_1+r_2)})

v=\sqrt{GM(2/r-1/a)}, where a is the semi-major axis.

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought this was pretty straightforward but apparently my answers are incorrect. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. My interpretation is that the satellite is in orbit at 2RE=r1, we need to get it into a transition orbit and to do so we increase the velocity by amount Δv1, we then stabilize this orbit at 4RE=r2 by increasing velocity once more.

Plugging in the knowns to the above equation I get:

Δv1=865.2 m/s

Δv2=725.7 m/s

Now I need to represent these changes in velocity as percentages of the velocity just before the given change. The initial velocity can be found using this equation:

v0=\sqrt{GM(2/r-1/a)}

In this case, being a circular orbit, r=a=2RE

v0= 5592.8 m/s

Also, the velocity after the first velocity change is v1=v0+Δv1=6458 m/s

So, the first answer should be:

\frac{Δv_1}{v_0}=15.47%

and the second answer:

\frac{Δv_2}{v_1}=11.24%

I also tried entering these as the decimal equivalents and tried simply using the initial velocity as the divisor when calculating my percents. None of this worked. Perhaps I have A and B mixed around because I don't have the image but I believe it is more likely that I made a mistake.

These answers are wrong. Any suggestions? Thank you!

EDIT: The reason I am given the extra variables in the initial problem is that there was a part before this that asked me to calculate the required energy to make the transition from 2R to 4R which I solved correctly.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The velocity just before the second change will not be the same as the velocity immediately after the first change; the craft is at perigee immediately after the first change, and heads out to apogee where the second change occurs. Otherwise your calculations appear to be fine.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ahh, of course! Thank you, gneill!

Would I be able to plug in 4RE to the velocity equation? I ask because the satellite's trajectory is skewed in the sense that when it reaches 4RE it would not be stable if not for Δv2. I'm not sure how to figure the velocity at that point otherwise.
 
oddjobmj said:
Ahh, of course! Thank you, gneill!

Would I be able to plug in 4RE to the velocity equation? I ask because the satellite's trajectory is skewed in the sense that when it reaches 4RE it would not be stable if not for Δv2. I'm not sure how to figure the velocity at that point otherwise.

Your velocity equation holds for all points on the transfer trajectory, which would just be an ellipse if not for the second correction. So sure, plug in 4RE and obtain the velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ah, I see what you mean, thank you. My thought initially was to use 4RE assuming the orbit was circular. Of course, the transfer orbit is, as you mentioned, an ellipse. For anyone who has a similar problem in the future you can figure the semi-major axis of this ellipse to use in the velocity equation from the transfer orbit's perigee and apogee points which happen to fall on the two known circular orbits.

Using your suggestion(s) and that noted above the correct answer was found.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top