Find EN Values for Compounds w/ > 2 Elements

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sace Ver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
AI Thread Summary
To find the electronegativity (EN) value for compounds with more than two elements, simply subtracting the EN values of individual elements can lead to confusion and negative results. The discussion highlights that the term "EN value" may lack clarity without proper context, especially when applied to complex compounds like C6H12O6. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding how to interpret EN values correctly rather than relying on straightforward subtraction. Overall, the conversation underscores the need for a more nuanced approach to calculating EN in multi-element compounds. Understanding the context and application of EN values is crucial for accurate analysis.
Sace Ver
Messages
79
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


How do I find the EN value for a compound with more than two elements?

Homework Equations


C6H12O6

The Attempt at a Solution


Do I just subtract all EN values?

I don't think so bc then I get negative numbers so confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"EN Value?" What are you talking about?
 
Bystander said:
"EN Value?" What are you talking about?
Electronegativity chart and values
 
"EN" means very little within context; application "out of context" (the carbohydrate formula) is totally meaningless.
 
Sace Ver said:
1.

The Attempt at a Solution


Do I just subtract all EN values?

I don't think so bc then I get negative numbers so confused.


What exactly do you mean by this?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top