Find final rotational kinetic energy without knowing radius?

AI Thread Summary
To find the rotational kinetic energy of a basketball rolling off a table, the key is to use the relationship between linear speed and angular velocity, which allows for the moment of inertia to be expressed without needing the radius. The initial translational kinetic energy and potential energy can be calculated, but the rotational kinetic energy requires knowing the moment of inertia, which for a basketball is often misidentified. Once the ball leaves the table, it continues to rotate at the same rate, meaning its rotational kinetic energy remains constant until impact. Ultimately, the solution reveals that the rotational energy can be determined by substituting unknowns that cancel out, leading to the final answer of 0.506J.
matxjos
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 0.125kg basketball is rolling w/out slipping on a horizontal table at 4.50 m/s when it rolls off the edge and it falls to the floor, 1.10 m below. What is the rotational kinetic energy of the ball right before hitting floor?

Homework Equations


KE rot: .5 I w^2
KE translational: .5 m v^2
PE: mgh

The Attempt at a Solution


Initial: I figured out KE translational and PE for the initial conditions on the horizontal surface, these are easy.

I do not know how to get K rotational energy!

Final: I used vertical constant acceleration equations to find the final velocity. Then I got the kinetic energy right before hitting the floor. Potential energy is 0.

No idea how to get K rot energy!

I've been working on this problem forever (all morning). The answer to the problem is apparently 0.506J.

HOW?!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Once the ball leaves the table there's nothing to provide torque to change its rotation, so ignore everything that happens after it leaves the table.

Write an expression for the rotation rate of the ball as it rolls. That's the ##\omega## for your rotational kinetic energy expression. What expression will you use for the moment of inertia?

(P.S. I feel that the problem author used an incorrect moment of inertia; a basketball is a thin spherical shell, not a solid sphere).
 
gneill said:
Once the ball leaves the table there's nothing to provide torque to change its rotation, so ignore everything that happens after it leaves the table.

Write an expression for the rotation rate of the ball as it rolls. That's the ##\omega## for your rotational kinetic energy expression. What expression will you use for the moment of inertia?

(P.S. I feel that the problem author used an incorrect moment of inertia; a basketball is a thin spherical shell, not a solid sphere).


Well, a solid sphere's moment of inertia is 2/5MR^2. Is this the expression I use? I still don't know the radius...

I'm not even sure what you mean to write an expression for the rotation rate. Like in rad/s? I know how to get that from rev/min, or even m/s, but I don't know the radius. :(

Thanks for looking at this problem!
 
gneill said:
Once the ball leaves the table there's nothing to provide torque to change its rotation, so ignore everything that happens after it leaves the table.

Wait, if there is no rotation after the ball leaves the table, does that mean the rotational energy is zero? Or just the same as the initial KE rot?
 
matxjos said:
Well, a solid sphere's moment of inertia is 2/5MR^2.
Solid basketballs?! That's serious training.
I still don't know the radius...
You'll find you don't need to. Just put in an unknown for it and it should cancel out later.
I'm not even sure what you mean to write an expression for the rotation rate. Like in rad/s?
Yes. Create another unknown for this, and an equation relating it to linear speed and radius.
if there is no rotation after the ball leaves the table
gneill said there'd be no change in rotation rate.
 
haruspex said:
Solid basketballs?! That's serious training.

You'll find you don't need to. Just put in an unknown for it and it should cancel out later.

Yes. Create another unknown for this, and an equation relating it to linear speed and radius.

gneill said there'd be no change in rotation rate.

Wow, thanks, I got the answer! I didn't realize things cancel out...physics is most confusing when that has to happen. But very interesting.

Thanks haruspex and gneill! :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top