Find I: Solving Electrical Circuits

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving electrical circuits using Kirchhoff's laws, specifically finding the current (I) at various branches. A participant expresses confusion over the direction of current arrows and how it affects their calculations, noting discrepancies in their results compared to the textbook. Others clarify that while the direction of arrows can be arbitrary, consistency is crucial, and errors often arise from incorrect assumptions about current flow. They suggest simplifying the circuit by combining resistances to reduce complexity and avoid mistakes. Ultimately, the participant successfully resolves their issue and arrives at the correct current value of 1.6A with guidance from others.
cdotter
Messages
305
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img688.imageshack.us/img688/1452/45481808.png

Find I at all branches.

Homework Equations


\sum I=0 for a junction.
\sum V =0 for a closed loop.


The Attempt at a Solution



I found the solution but I don't understand why they chose certain variables like why the arrows are in a certain direction. From my understanding it's completely arbitrary but when I do it my own way I get a completely different answer.

Could someone tell me if this would give the correct answer?

The arrows and currents I_1, I_2, and I_3 are all drawn in by me.

I_3 = I_1 + I_2 per the junction law. I could then find I for the top inner loop and I for the outer loop, and solve the two simultaneous equations. The other two currents could then be found by back-substitution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi cdotter! :smile:

(btw, two h's in Kirchhoff! :wink:)
cdotter said:
I found the solution but I don't understand why they chose certain variables like why the arrows are in a certain direction. From my understanding it's completely arbitrary but when I do it my own way I get a completely different answer.

you should get the same answer whichever way you do the arrows :confused:

the only difference is that if you put say the I1 arrow the wrong way round, you get a result for I1 multiplied by -1 :smile:

but why are you using round arrows next to the wires? that's really confusing …

put arrows on the wires!

if you're still getting the wrong answer, show us your full calculations, and then we'll see how to help :wink:
 
I don't know, that's just the way my physics professor does it. :confused:

For the top inner loop:

10V-I_1 \cdot 3 \Omega -((I_1+I_2) \cdot 4 \Omega) + 5V - ((I_1+I_2) \cdot 1 \Omega) - I_1 \cdot 2 \Omega=0
15V-I_1\cdot 10 \Omega - I_2 \cdot 5 \Omega=0
\Rightarrow I_2=3A-I_1 \cdot 2

For the outside loop:

10V-I_1 \cdot 3 \Omega - I_2 \cdot 10 \Omega - I_1 \cdot 2 \Omega=0
10V-I_1 \cdot 5 \Omega - I_2 \cdot 10 \Omega=0

Substitute in the top inner loop term:

10V-I_1 \cdot 5 \Omega - (3A-I_1 \cdot 2) \cdot 10 \Omega=0
10V-I_1 \cdot 5 \Omega - (30V-I_1 \cdot 20 \Omega)=0
\Rightarrow I_1= \frac{20V}{15 \Omega} = 1.33 A[/itex]<br /> <br /> According to my textbook, this isn&#039;t right. It should be 1.60 A. Where am I going wrong?
 
hi cdotter! :smile:
cdotter said:
I don't know, that's just the way my physics professor does it. :confused:

yup, well this is what happens if you don't use straight arrows on every available line…

it's too easy to make a mistake, in this case you haven't noticed that the arrows are going the opposite way at the bottom of the outer loop! :redface:

try again, and in future i suggest you ignore your professor and go for the straight arrows! :rolleyes:

(alternatively, only use the loops with the round arrows on them, in this case the top loop and the bottom loop)
 
[PLAIN]http://img602.imageshack.us/img602/1452/45481808.png

[PLAIN]http://img703.imageshack.us/img703/8694/giflatex.gif

The answer is still wrong. It should be 1.60A. Where am I making a mistake?

edit: My algebra is a bit wrong. It should be 2.7A. Still wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hi cdotter! :smile:

your 7ΩI1 should be 10ΩI1 :redface:

(btw, you don't have to do everything in cyclic order …

it's much easier to add the 2Ω to the 3Ω, and the 1Ω to the 4Ω, right at the start, and you're less likely to make a mistake if you do that! :wink:)
 
tiny-tim said:
hi cdotter! :smile:

your 7ΩI1 should be 10ΩI1 :redface:

(btw, you don't have to do everything in cyclic order …

it's much easier to add the 2Ω to the 3Ω, and the 1Ω to the 4Ω, right at the start, and you're less likely to make a mistake if you do that! :wink:)

You can do that even though they're on different sides of the voltage source? That would make it much, much easier.
 
Yup, so long as they have the same current through them! :biggrin:
 
I'm finally getting 1.6A! :biggrin: Thank you very much for your help and patience, tiny-tim.
 
Back
Top