MHB Find $\left[T\right]_\beta^\beta$ for NMH{823}

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the transition matrix \(\left[T\right]_\beta^\beta\) for the linear transformation defined by \(T\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ z\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}x+ 2y- z \\ 2x- y+ z \\ x+ z\end{bmatrix}\). A user calculates the transformation of the vector \(\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}\) and finds it results in \(\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 3 \\ 2 \end{bmatrix}\), which differs from an expected result. They derive equations to express this output in terms of the basis vectors, ultimately determining the first column of the transition matrix as \(\begin{bmatrix}\frac{8}{5} \\ \frac{2}{5} \\ \frac{11}{5}\end{bmatrix}\). The conversation highlights the importance of showing detailed steps in calculations for clarity.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
nmh{823}

13.PNG

ok just want to see if I went the right direction with this before I launch into the rref
of which I would use a online calculator to do if I could find one.
$\left[T\right]_\beta^\beta$ should be on the right after rref
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Given that T\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ z\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}x+ 2y- z \\ 2x- y+ z \\ x+ z\end{bmatrix}

Then T\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}1+ 2(0)- 1 \\ 2(1)- 0+ 1 \\ 1+ 1\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 3\\ 2 \end{bmatrix}. That is very different from your "\begin{bmatrix}2 \\ 0 \\ 2 \end{bmatrix}". Am I misunderstanding something?

To write that in basis \beta you want to find numbers, A, B, C such that
A\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}+ B\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 2 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}+ C\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}A+ B+ C \\ 2B+ C \\A+ B \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} 0 \\ 3 \\ 2 \end{bmatrix}.

So we have the three equations, A+ B+ C= 0, 2B+ C= 3, and A+ B= 2. From the second equation C= 3- 2B, and from the third, A= 2- B. Putting those into the first equation, A+ B+ C= 2- B+ B+ 3- 2B= 5- 2B= 0. 2B= 5 so B= 2/5. Then C= 3- 4/5= 11/5 and A= 2- 2/5= 8/5. The first column of the transition matrix is \begin{bmatrix}\frac{8}{5} \\ \frac{2}{5} \\ \frac{11}{5}\end{bmatrix}.
 
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8893

how did they get these (red)
 
karush said:
how did they get these (red)
They applied the operator T to the vector using either the explicit form of the matrix T just above or by using the original definition.

[math]T \left [ \begin{matrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 2 \end{matrix} \right ] = \left ( \begin{matrix} 5 & 0 & 1 \\ 3 & 2 & -3 \\ 5 & 0 & 0 \end{matrix} \right ) \left [ \begin{matrix} 1 \\ 1 \\ 2 \end{matrix} \right ] = \left [ \begin{matrix} 5(1) + 0(1) + 1(2) \\ 3(1) + 2(1) - 3(2) \\ 5(1) + 0(1) + 0(2) \end{matrix} \right ] = \left [ \begin{matrix} 7 \\ -1 \\ 5 \end{matrix} \right ] [/math]

-Dan
 
Looks obvious now
But i couldn't see that

Sometimes I wish they would show more steps rather that assume things but then ..;)

Just glad there is a good forum to call on
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K