Find Line Intersecting Line 1 & 2 at 90°: Vector, Parametric & Symmetric Eqs

AI Thread Summary
To find the line that intersects both given lines L1 and L2 at a 90° angle, the discussion outlines a method involving the use of vector equations and dot products. The user derived two equations based on the conditions of perpendicularity, ultimately finding values for parameters t and s. These parameters correspond to specific points on each line, leading to coordinates (2, 5, 3) on L1 and (1, 3, 1) on L2. The next step is to derive the equation of the line that connects these two points, ensuring it remains perpendicular to both original lines. The process and calculations are confirmed to be on the right track, with the final goal of verifying the perpendicularity through dot products.
Failure007
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the vector, parametric and symmetric equations of a line that intersect both line 1 and line 2 at 90°.
L1 :

x = 4 + 2t
y = 8 + 3t
z = -1 - 4t
L2 :

x = 7 - 6t
y = 2+ t
z = -1 + 2t

Homework Equations



\vec{a}1 - \vec{a}2 + \vec{b}1t - \vec{b}2s

The Attempt at a Solution



=[4,8,-1] - [7,2,-1] + [2t, 3t, -4t] - [-6s, 1s, 2s]

=[-3, 6, 0] + [(2t + 6s), (3t-1s), (-4t-2s)]

=[(-3 + 2t +6s), (6 + 3t - s), (0 - 4t -2s)]

=[2, 3, -4] . [(-3 + 2t +6s), (6 + 3t - s), (0 - 4t -2s)]

=(-6 + 4t + 12s) + (18 + 9t -3s) + (0 +16t + 8s)

=12 + 29t +17s -------(equation 1)

=[-6, 1, 2] . [(-3 + 2t +6s), (6 + 3t - s), (0 - 4t -2s)]

=(18 -12t -36s) + (6 + 3t - s) + (0 -8t -4s)

=24 -17t -41s ----------(equation 2)

29t + 17s = -12
-17 -41s = -24

-493t -1189s = -696
-493t -289s =204
-900s = -900

Therefore, s = 1

29 + 17(1) = -12
29t = -29

Therefore, t=-1

At these values, the dot product of

\vec{b}1 . (\vec{a}1 - \vec{a}2 + \vec{b}1t - \vec{b}2s)

and

\vec{b}2 . (\vec{a}1 - \vec{a}2 + \vec{b}1t - \vec{b}2s)

both equal 0, meaning this should be perpendicular to both lines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm honestly not even sure if I'm on the right track with this but it seemed like it was working up until this point, however I'm not really sure how to derive the vector equation from this given information, so if anyone at all has some info that would point me in the right direction it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks to anyone and everyone willing to help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You may have confused yourself by writing equals signs on every single line; you should only use that symbol to connect statements that actually are equal. You may want to describe things this way:

You have the lines

L1 :
x = 4 + 2t
y = 8 + 3t
z = -1 - 4t

L2 :
x = 7 - 6s
y = 2+ s
z = -1 + 2s

A line connecting a point on L1 with a point on L2 satisfies

[4,8,-1] - [7,2,-1] + [2t, 3t, -4t] - [-6s, 1s, 2s]

= [-3, 6, 0] + [(2t + 6s), (3t-1s), (-4t-2s)]

= [(-3 + 2t +6s), (6 + 3t - s), (0 - 4t -2s)] .

A line through these points and perpendicular to both L1 and L2 must simultaneously satisfy

[2, 3, -4] . [(-3 + 2t +6s), (6 + 3t - s), (0 - 4t -2s)]

= (-6 + 4t + 12s) + (18 + 9t -3s) + (0 +16t + 8s)

=12 + 29t +17s = 0 -------(equation 1)

AND

[-6, 1, 2] . [(-3 + 2t +6s), (6 + 3t - s), (0 - 4t -2s)]

=(18 -12t -36s) + (6 + 3t - s) + (0 -8t -4s)

=24 -17t -41s = 0 ----------(equation 2)

The values of t and s which satisfy both of these equations are given by

29t + 17s = -12
-17t -41s = -24

-493t -1189s = -696
-493t -289s =204
-900s = -900

[Ah, here's a faster way to do this: the second equals equals something exactly twice as big as the first, so

2 · (29t + 17s) = -17t - 41s , or

58t + 34s = -17t - 41s , so 75t = -75s , or t = -s .

Putting this result into either equation shows that
t = -s = -1 . ]

Now then, you have the values of the parameter for a point on each line. Putting the appropriate parameter into the equations for L1 or L2 gives you the coordinates of the point on each line, for which the segment linking them is perpendicular to both L1 and L2. Finally, find the equation(s) of the line containing both of those points.

Your ideas for solving the problem are basically sound. And when you find the vector for the solution line, you will indeed find that its dot products with the vectors for L1 and L2 are both zero.
 
Last edited:


First of all thanks for responding, what I'm still sort of confused about is if I plugged those parameters into their respective equations i.e.

[x,y,z] = [4,8,-1] + -1[2,3,-4] = [2, 5, 3] for line 1

[x,y,z] = [7,2,-1] + 1[-6,1,2] = [1, 3, 1] for line 2

would that mean that those aren't the correct parameters or do I have more work to do? I'm not really sure where I would begin.
 


What you now have are the coordinates of a point on each line,

(2, 5, 3) on line 1 and (1, 3, 1) on line 2 .

That is where the parameters t and s are telling us those points are. You set up the system of two equations to solve for the point on L1 and on L2 such that the line passing through both intersects both L1 and L2 at right angles.

You now want to find the equation for the line which contains both (2, 5, 3) and (1, 3, 1) -- and you're done! Check the dot products of that line's vector with the vectors for L1 and L2 and see what you get...
 


Makes perfect sense, thanks so much.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top