Chemistry Find mass from mole frac and solution mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter jesuslovesu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Mole
AI Thread Summary
To find the masses of propane and butane in a 75g gaseous mixture with a mole fraction of 0.51 for propane, the total moles of the gases must be calculated using their mole fractions. The equation X = mol A / mol total helps establish the relationship between the moles of propane and butane. The initial attempt to set up equations using the mole fractions was incorrect, as it did not incorporate the total mass of the mixture effectively. A correct approach involves using the mass of each component and their respective molar masses to solve for the individual masses of propane and butane. This requires setting up a system of equations that includes both the total mass and the mole fraction relationships.
jesuslovesu
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
1. 75g sample of a gaseous mixture contains .51 mole fraction propane. The remainder is butane. What are the masses of propane and butane?



2. X = mol A / mol total



The Attempt at a Solution


P = mol propane
B = mol butane
I tried doing .49P + .49B = X mol propane and .51P + .51B = Y mol butane however that doesn't seem to be solvable. I'm not quite sure how I should manipulate the 75 g of solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
0.49B + 0.51P = n

second equation must contain masses of both gases - what is a mass of 0.49B?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top