Find masses of particles on pulleys attached by strings

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving particles suspended by strings over smooth pulleys. It is established that if particle B has a mass of 1 kg, then particle C must also have a mass of 1 kg due to the equilibrium conditions of the system. The mass of particle A is calculated to be approximately 1.41 kg, derived from the tension in the strings and the angles involved. The participants clarify that the system's equilibrium is essential for determining the mass relationships and that the smooth pulleys ensure equal tension throughout the strings. The symmetry of the setup, along with the angles, is crucial for confirming these mass relationships.
moenste
Messages
711
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


A particle A is suspended as shown in the figure by two strings, which pass over smooth pulleys, and are attached to particles B and C. At A, the strings are at right angles to each other, and make equal angles with the horizontal. If the mass of B is 1 kg, what are the masses of A and C?

4ad0786d3fd7.jpg


Answers: A = √2 kg (20.5 kg), C = 1 kg

2. The attempt at a solution
For C:
If B = 1 kg and then it should be equal to C and C = 1 kg. I would say that because the system is in equilibrium and this is the reason, but it is not stated that the system is in eq. so I don't quite know why C is equal to 1 kg and not 1.1 or 0.9 kg.

For A:
At first I thought that A = B + C so 2 kg which is wrong. Then I though that if we take B as 1 kg, the angle as 45 degrees then A should be 1 cos 45. Adding another 1 cos 45 due to C is 2 cos 45 = 1.41 kg or root 2. But again, not sure about whether this logic is correct.

Any tips please? Thank you very much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it is not stated that the system is in eq.
Well observed. Problem isn't solvable if not in eq, so you can safely assume it is.

Remember the conditions for A in eq ? there are two components to ##\Sigma \vec F## !
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
BvU said:
Well observed. Problem isn't solvable if not in eq, so you can safely assume it is.

Remember the conditions for A in eq ? there are two components to ##\Sigma \vec F## !
In that case if we assume that the system is in eq. then C = B = 1 kg.

Concerning A: a body is in equilibrium if the resultant force on its centre of mass is zero, and the total torque about all axes is zero; condition: the resultant force in any two directions in the plane of the forces is zero. 1 cos 45 [ B] = 1 cos 45 [C] as I understand it.
 
Yes. No worry about torque needed here. Just a simple sum of forces. Two tensions and one from gravity. The tensions in each of the strings are equal at each end (thanks to the pulleys). Directions are given.
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
BvU said:
Yes. No worry about torque needed here. Just a simple sum of forces. Two tensions and one from gravity. The tensions in each of the strings are equal at each end (thanks to the pulleys). Directions are given.
So, the solution as I understand:
1. First we assume that the system is in an equilibrium.
2. Because the system is in eq. then B = C = 1 kg.
3.
a37aa58db9ad.jpg

Tension in vertical lines is 10 N. Lines which are attached to A are also equal to 10 N (true? because they are the same vertical lines that is why they are 10 N?).
4. Drawing two triangles which have two 45 angles. We need to find the adjacent side in the triangle: 10 cos 45. Because we have two triangles then 2 * 10 cos 45 = 14.14 N. Diving by 10 m/s2 we get 1.41 kg or 20.5 = A.

This is correct?
 
Very much so.

You still seem a bit insecure about these tensions on the wires: If the tensions were not equal, the wire itself would accelerate!

The fact that the system is in equilibrium is not enough to establish mB = mC , though. Can you think of the deciding information in the problem statement that does this ?
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
BvU said:
You still seem a bit insecure about these tensions on the wires: If the tensions were not equal, the wire itself would accelerate!
I also read in a different source that due to "smooth pulleys" there is no tension and that's why 10 N is thoughout the whole wire. This logic is correct?

The fact that the system is in equilibrium is not enough to establish mB = mC , though. Can you think of the deciding information in the problem statement that does this ?
As I think it's either "smooth pulleys", so there is no tension and 10 N of the B side should be equal to 10 N of the C side and -> C = 1 kg. Or it's because the angle is 90 degrees at A so the masses of both B and C should be equal.
 
moenste said:
I also read in a different source that due to "smooth pulleys" there is no tension and that's why 10 N is thoughout the whole wire. This logic is correct?
A smooth pulley can not exercise a force along the wire anywhere where it touches the pulley, so it can't change the tension: there's no tension difference between the two ends of a wire over a smooth pulley.
If a pulley is not smooth, there still are several possibilities: the wire can slip or not and the pulley rotation can be free or with friction. For a static problem the slipping isn't an issue, but friction in the pulley bearing can exercise a torque on the wire -- which gives a tension difference between the ends of the wire.

As I think it's either "smooth pulleys", so there is no tension and 10 N of the B side should be equal to 10 N of the C side and -> C = 1 kg. Or it's because the angle is 90 degrees at A so the masses of both B and C should be equal.
No friction is indeed a necessary condition. The 90 degrees actually isn't. Together, that's still not enough. The "the strings make equal angles with the horizontal" is essential too and clinches it: The main and crucial argument for ##m_B = m_C## is symmetry: your pulleys are static as well, so they both must be in equilibrium, with ##\ \ \Sigma \vec F = 0\ \ ##. Since they are frictionless, the tensions in the vertical direction are the same as in the 45 degree direction. For A too you have ##\ \ \Sigma \vec F = 0\ \ ##, so the horizontal components of the tension forces on A must be opposite and equal, which forces ##m_Bg\cos 45^\circ = m_Cg\cos 45^\circ ## .

You can check for yourself if you now understand the whole thing: repeat the exercise with 60##^\circ## or 120##^\circ## instead of the 90##^\circ##

:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes moenste
BvU said:
No friction is indeed a necessary condition. The 90 degrees actually isn't. Together, that's still not enough. The "the strings make equal angles with the horizontal" is essential too and clinches it: The main and crucial argument for ##m_B = m_C## is symmetry: your pulleys are static as well, so they both must be in equilibrium, with ##\ \ \Sigma \vec F = 0\ \ ##. Since they are frictionless, the tensions in the vertical direction are the same as in the 45 degree direction. For A too you have ##\ \ \Sigma \vec F = 0\ \ ##, so the horizontal components of the tension forces on A must be opposite and equal, which forces ##m_Bg\cos 45^\circ = m_Cg\cos 45^\circ ## .

You can check for yourself if you now understand the whole thing: repeat the exercise with 60##^\circ## or 120##^\circ## instead of the 90##^\circ##

:smile:
So, for 60 degrees it's: mB g cos 30 = mC g cos 30 = 1 kg and 2 kg * g * cos 30 = 17.32 N and A = 1.73 kg. For 120 degrees it's: mB g cos 60 = mC g cos 60 = 1 kg and 2 kg * g * cos 60 = 10 N and A = 1 kg.
 
  • #10
Spot on !
 
  • Like
Likes moenste

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
866
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top