Find Min Distance b/w Origin & Surface z^2= [8-y^2-x^4*y^2]/2

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the minimum distance between the origin and the surface defined by the equation z² = [8 - y² - x⁴y²]/2. The correct approach involves minimizing the squared distance function d² = x² + y² + z², which simplifies the calculations by eliminating the square root. The participants confirm that the critical points occur at (±1, ±1) and (0, 0), with the minimum distance calculated as √5. The method of Lagrange multipliers is also suggested as an alternative approach to verify the results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus, specifically partial derivatives
  • Familiarity with optimization techniques, including Lagrange multipliers
  • Knowledge of distance metrics in three-dimensional space
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions and solve systems of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of Lagrange multipliers in detail for constrained optimization
  • Practice solving optimization problems involving distance minimization
  • Explore the implications of minimizing squared functions versus their square roots
  • Review multivariable calculus concepts, focusing on partial derivatives and critical points
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, engineering, and physics who are interested in optimization problems and multivariable calculus techniques.

schattenjaeger
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
find the minimum distance between the origin and the surface z^2=[8-y^2-x^4*y^2]/2

so d=sqrt(x^2+y^2+z^2)^(1/2) where for z^2 I sub in that expression in x and y?

so then I take the partials of d wrt to x and y and set those equal to 0, then I solved that system of equations and got x=+-1 and y=+-1 but I'm not sure about that. I also got x=0 and y=0 but I guess that's the max distance since it's the initial point? I dunno. I got the ultimate distance being sqrt(5) by plugging 1 back into the expression for d, you're welcome to practice on it too but I just need to know if the procedure was right
 
Physics news on Phys.org
schattenjaeger said:
find the minimum distance between the origin and the surface z^2=[8-y^2-x^4*y^2]/2

so d=sqrt(x^2+y^2+z^2)^(1/2) where for z^2 I sub in that expression in x and y?

so then I take the partials of d wrt to x and y and set those equal to 0, then I solved that system of equations and got x=+-1 and y=+-1 but I'm not sure about that. I also got x=0 and y=0 but I guess that's the max distance since it's the initial point? I dunno. I got the ultimate distance being sqrt(5) by plugging 1 back into the expression for d, you're welcome to practice on it too but I just need to know if the procedure was right

Proceedure is correct, but it can be simplified since the point at which the minimum distance occurs is also where the square ofthe distance is minimized (so you can drop the square root on d and get the same location). Another method is to use the method of Lagrange multipliers: I'll use it to check your work.

We want to minimize [tex]d^2=x^2+y^2+z^2[/tex] subject to the constraint [tex]2z^2+y^2+x^4y^2=8[/tex]. According to the method of Lagrange multipliers we should solve this system of equations:

[tex]\left< 2x,2y,2z\right> = \lambda\left< 4x^3y^2,2y+2x^4y,4z \right>[/tex] and [tex]2z^2+y^2+x^4y^2=8[/tex]

this simplifies to

[tex]x=2\lambda x^3y^2[tex] [tex]y=\lambda y(1+x^4)[tex] [tex]z=2\lambda z[tex] [tex]2z^2+y^2(1+x^4)=8[/tex]<br /> <br /> according to the third equation, either [tex]z=0[/tex] or [tex]\lambda =\frac{1}{2}[/tex]. Assume presently that [tex]z=0[/tex], then the fourth equations becomes [tex]y^2(1+x^4)=8[/tex] so that multipling the second equation by y gives [tex]y^2=\lambda y^2(1+x^4) = 8\lambda[tex]and putting this into the first equation gives [tex]x=16\lambda ^2 x^3[tex] <br /> finish later perhaps... (seems like the other method would be easier).[/tex][/tex][/tex][/tex][/tex][/tex][/tex][/tex][/tex][/tex]
 
Last edited:
yah I noticed that, when you work it out you get

Fx=1/2(original expression to the -1/2)(another expression)=0

Fy=1/2(original to the -1/2)(another)=0

so you can just chuck the original expressions and solve the two "others" for x and y, which is where you end up if you start from d^2

I couldn't quite convince myself that the minimum of the distance would be the mininum of the d^2 function, I might just be thinking too hard
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K