Find Min Energy of Particle Using Uncertainty Principle

darussiaman
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is confined to a one-dimensional region of length a.
a.) use the uncertainty principle to obtain an expression for the minimum energy of the particle

b.) calculate the value of this energy for a 1g bead on a 10 cm wire, and for an electron in a region of 1 A in length.

Homework Equations



umm, as far as I'm aware, the only thing we're supposed to know is deltax*deltap => h-bar/2 and the energy-time analog of that. This is first of 3 semesters of quantum so we're not doing anything deep here, the needed equations on all the homework problems have so far been just the basic, simple ones so this shouldn't be any different...

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I'm not sure how to set it up. This looks like it should be an easy question but having trouble for some reason. First, is this problem saying that deltax (uncertainty in position) is equal to a? If so, then the uncertainty in momentum is deltap => h-bar/(2a). OKay, so what? Energy ... well, kinetic energy = (1/2)*momentum*velocity ... so i could multiply both sides by that and would end up with uncertainty in energy on the left side, but velocity could be anything?? The delta_energy*delta time doesn't seem to be helpful either because what is change in time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Energy is momentum squared divided by twice the mass:

E=p^2/2m
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top