Find minimum force to move block

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum force required to move block A upwards, considering both friction and no friction scenarios. The force required with friction is determined to be 887.3 N, while without friction it is 577.4 N. The user expresses difficulty in accounting for the frictional forces and normal forces acting on the blocks, leading to a circular dependency in their equations. They suggest using free body diagrams and conservation of energy principles to resolve the problem, emphasizing the complexity introduced by friction. Ultimately, the challenge lies in accurately expressing the normal forces in relation to the applied force.
the_sense
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Figure 1 shows two wedge blocks A and B, weighing 1000 N and 50 N, respectively, in contact. The coefficient of friction between all contacting surfaces is 0.1 . What would be the smallest value of P required to push the block A upwards? What would be its value if there were no friction?"

Ans, with friction: 887.3 N (given)
Ans, without friction: 577.4 N (given)
The gray rectangle in the picture is part of a separate problem.

Homework Equations



<br /> ƩF = 0<br />

<br /> F_f = μF_N<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


I have solved problems of this nature before. I have a good understanding of vector addition and statics. I solved the problem sans friction in the following manner:

<br /> F_N = W_A /cos30<br />

<br /> ƩF_x = 0 ∴ F_N \cdot cos60 = P<br />

<br /> P = W_A \cdot cos60 /cos30 = 577.4 N<br />

With friction, however, I run into a problem: The side walls in contact with A exert a frictional force downwards. This of course depends on the normal force exerted by those walls, which partly balance the horizontal components of the normal and frictional forces exerted by B on A. But as far as I can tell, the vertical component of the normal force is equal to the sum of the weight and these frictional forces. So I encounter what appears to be a catch-22. I have tried various methods employing systems of equations but I get nowhere.
 

Attachments

  • Solid_Frustration.png
    Solid_Frustration.png
    22 KB · Views: 976
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would try the work-energy relation and conservation of energy.
Otherwise you'd have to draw the free body diagrams.

The wrinkle I see is that block A also gets pressed against the side of the whatsits that constrains it to the vertical - in proportion to the applied force. (The applied force ends up creating a couple with the reaction forces in the constraint - I suspect that this is "overthinking" the problem at the level it is presented.)

You should get a number of equations where it appears that things have a circular dependence - and you can cancel terms.
 
Ok, I will try that. Thanks for the help.
 
At least you have nice angles:

sin(30)=1/2
cos(30)=(√3)/2
tan(30)=1/√3

... you can replace the trig functions with the fractions (keep the surd until the end).
Most of them seem to come out to 1/2.
In all your triangles for this problem, find the 30deg angle and do all your trig with that as theta
... you will get less confused.
 
Conservation of energy means: ##E_{in} = E_{out} + E_{lost}##.

Applied force P over distance x, energy input: Ein = Px.

This energy goes to gravitational PE, ##U##, in A, and three lots of friction:
E1: between B and the ground
E2: between the blocks
E3: between A and the restraining channel.

So: ##E_{in}=U+E_1+E_2+E_3##

##U=w_A\Delta y:w_A=m_Ag=1000\text{N}##
B moving x means A moves up ##\Delta y=x\tan(30^\circ)=x/\sqrt{3}##
##\Rightarrow U=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}w_Ax##

Without friction: ##P=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}w_A##

... which is where you are up to ;)


As you have observed, the friction is the tricky bit.

The ith energy lost to friction is ##E_i=f_id## where d is the distance moved against friction and ##f_i=\mu N_i## ... so you are finding expressions for the "normal force", ##N_i## ... which will mean drawing free-body diagrams. Assuming flush surfaces will probably avoid having to think about couples.

i.e. For ##i=1## (the first friction): ##d=x##, and ##N_1 = w_B+\text{<contributions from }w_A\text{>} ##

Try to express each normal force in terms of P and x and constants, where applicable.
You'll end up with something like ##Px=\big(p(P)+q\big)x## where you can eliminate x and solve for P.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top