Find Potential at Point P: Electric Potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at point P (1.5 m, 3.5 m) in a uniform electric field defined by E = (16 V/m) i + (8.5 V/m) j, with the potential set to 0 at the origin. The participant initially misunderstands the relationship between electric field and potential, considering distance and charge influence. They realize that the correct approach involves using the dot product of the electric field and the displacement vector, rather than simply multiplying magnitudes. Ultimately, they confirm that the potential at point P is -54V, aligning with the answer provided in their textbook. This illustrates the importance of understanding vector operations in physics calculations.
tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
If \overrightarrow E = \left( {16\,{\rm{V/m}}} \right)\,{\rm{\hat i + }}\left( {{\rm{8}}{\rm{.5 V/m}}} \right){\rm{\hat j}} and the potential is 0 at the origin, find the potential at point P with coordinates x=1.5 m, y=3.5 m.

I made a diagram. (each tick mark = 2 units). I imagine this is just a uniform electric field. The equipotential lines are perpendicular to the field lines. The two lines going up and to the right are field lines, and the two perpendicular lines are lines of equipotential. The one passing through the origin is 0V. The other one is passing through the point (1.5, 3.5), but I don't know its value. Don't I need to know how far away the charge is that is creating the Electric field in order to determine how potential will change with distance?
25_29.GIF


 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can set this up as a line integral (if you're doing calculus based physics). That is, pick your path (\vec{r}(t)=(1.5t,3.5t,0) with 0\le t\le1 would be a good one) and use

V_f-V_i=-\int \vec{E}\circ d\vec{r}.
 
I don't understand that.

I'm still stuck on this. All I can think to do is compute the magnitude of the electric field: sqrt(16^2 + 8.5^2), and the distance from point P to the origin: sqrt(1.5^2 + 3.5^2), and since V=Ed, multiply them together which gives me 70V. But the answer in the back of the book is -54V.
 
I got it! It's dot product of E*V, not regular old multiplication of |E|*|V| which is what I was doing. Now I get -54 like the back of the book.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top