Find potential energy using time-independent Schrodinger's equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the potential energy function U(x) using the time-independent Schrödinger equation. The derived expression for U(x) is (2h^2/mL^4)(x^2 - 3L^2/2), which indicates a parabolic shape centered at x = 0. The solution key confirms that U(0) equals −3h^2/mL^2, suggesting that plugging in x = 0 yields the correct value for U(x). The participants clarify that the parabolic nature of U(x) is evident from its quadratic form. Understanding these aspects is crucial for accurately interpreting the potential energy in quantum mechanics.
eloiseh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
In a region of space, a particle with mass m and with zero energy has a time-independent wave function ψ(x) = Axe^(−x^2/L^2) where A and L are constants.
Determine the potential energy U(x) of the particle.
Relevant Equations
The time-independent Schrodinger's equation
I had found what U(x) was equal to already by plugging in the wave function and simplifying, which is (2h^2/mL^4)(x^2 - 3L^2/2) by the way.

But the solution key that I have goes an extra step. After stating the equation of U(x) that I got, it says that: "U(x) is a parabola centred at x = 0 with U(0) = −3h^2/mL^2"

Does that mean that I have to plug 0 in for x for the right answer? And how to determine that U(x) is a parabola centred at x=0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eloiseh said:
I had found what U(x) was equal to already by plugging in the wave function and simplifying, which is (2h^2/mL^4)(x^2 - 3L^2/2) by the way.

Does that mean that I have to plug 0 in for x for the right answer? And how to determine that U(x) is a parabola centred at x=0?
Your solution is a parabola centred at ##x=0##.
 
PeroK said:
Your solution is a parabola centred at ##x=0##.
Thank you so much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top