Find Speed of Block Dropped on Spring: Mass, Height, Compression

  • Thread starter Thread starter grouchy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a 9.3 kg block dropped from a height of 800 cm onto a spring with a spring constant of 1086 N/m, which compresses by 50 cm. The transformation of energy is key, where gravitational potential energy (Eg) converts to kinetic energy (Ek) as the block falls, and then to elastic potential energy (Ee) upon spring compression. The user expresses confusion about applying the correct equations for energy transformation. They attempted to use the equation 1/2mv^2 = 1/2kx^2 but found it incorrect. Understanding the energy transformation process is essential for solving the problem accurately.
grouchy
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
A 9.3 kg block is dropped onto a spring of spring constant 1086 N/m from a height of 800 cm. When the block is momentarily at rest, the spring has been compressed by 50 cm. Find the speed of the block when the compression of the spring is 10 cm. The acceleration of gravity is 9.81 m/s^2. Answer in units of m/s.

Equations...
1/2kx^2
k = 1/2mv^2
u = mgh

my problem is I don't understand which equations to use in which situations,..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is simply a transformation of energy question.

Right at the start before the block is dropped, only gravitation potential energy (Eg) is present. Then all of the Eg is turned into kinetic energy (Ek) as the block falls. Just before the block hits the spring, all of the Eg is turned into Ek. Then the block impacts the spring and compressing it, turning Ek into Elastic potential energy (Ee).

Therefore, it would:

Eg-->Ek-->Ee

Using this transformation method, it would be very simple to solve this.
 
If I wasn't very familiar with the whole transformation of energy...how would I do this?
 
I tried 1/2mv^2 = 1/2kx^2 and it comes out wrong..
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top