Find Speed of Gayle & Brother on Sled After Descent from Hill

  • Thread starter Thread starter VelvetRebel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
Gayle starts at a speed of 4.23 m/s on a sled at rest and descends a vertical distance of 5.03 m before her brother joins her. To find their speed at the bottom of a total 14.1 m drop, conservation of momentum and energy principles must be applied. The initial speed before her brother hops on can be calculated using energy conservation, which accounts for the change in potential energy as she descends. After determining her speed prior to the collision, the combined speed can be calculated using momentum conservation, treating the situation as inelastic. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving the problem effectively.
VelvetRebel
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Gayle runs at a speed of 4.23 m/s and dives on a sled, which is initially at rest on the top of a frictionless snow-covered hill. After she has descended a vertical distance of 5.03 m, her brother, who is initially at rest, hops on her back and together they continue down the hill. What is their speed at the bottom of the hill if the total vertical drop is 14.1 m? Gayle's mass is 46.8 kg, the sled has a mass of 4.95 kg and her brother has a mass of 26.9 kg.

Homework Equations


conservation of momentum


The Attempt at a Solution



I have no idea where to start. I don't understand on where to incorporate the height into the problem. All I know is that you have to apply the conservation of momentum somewhere. I'm also assuming this is a totally inelastic situation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you will use conservation of momentum but determining the speeds upon "collision" will require conservation of energy to determine her/their speeds at various heights on the mountain. You need to determine her speed right before her little brother jumps on, and she will increase her speed due to her change in potential from the top.
 
Oh wow. That was really simple. Thanks for the help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top