Find the angular width of the central maximum.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular width of the central maximum in a single-slit diffraction pattern. The initial calculation used the formula θ = λ / b, resulting in an angular position of 19.1°, but the correct angular width is 38.9°. Participants clarify that the total angular width should account for both minima on either side of the central maximum, leading to a calculation of 2θ. A suggestion is made to use the equation sin θ = λ/d for more accurate results, especially for small angles. A request for a valid resource link is also made to assist with further calculations.
bsmm11
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A single slit of width 1.50 * 10-6m is illuminated with light of wavelength 500.0 nm. Find the angular width of the central maximum.

Homework Equations


θ = λ / b

The Attempt at a Solution


b = 1.50 * 10-6m
λ = 5.000 * 10-7
θ = λ / b = 0.333 = 19.1°

But the answer is 38.9°.

All my calculation of diffraction on single slit is off-target. It seems there is a fundamental point that I am missing. Please help. :frown:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have found the angular position,measured from the centre,of the pattern.There are two such minima,one on each side of the central maxima.
 
Last edited:
OK.. so what I need is 2Θ, right? Then I got 38.2, and this is a bit off from 38.9. Where did this difference come from?
 
I calculated it to be 38.9.The equation is:
sin theta=lambda/d.
Did you take theta to be in radians?If so that is a good approximation but only for very small angles.
 
I had a similar problem and was given this link.
http://www.calctool.org/CALC/phys/optics/fNA
It is a great link and solved my problem with units
 
Now I can solve the problems. Thanks everyone! :D

p.s. Emily, the link is not valid. Could you give me a right one? I can solve the problems, but still I want to check it out.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top