Find the coefficient of kinetic friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction for a skier weighing 90 kg descending a 17-degree hill and coasting 70 m on level snow. The initial calculations led to an unrealistic coefficient of 1.14, prompting participants to identify errors in the approach. Key issues included a sign error in applying kinematic equations and confusion over the ratio of distances in the friction formula. Ultimately, a revised calculation using the work-energy principle yielded a more plausible coefficient of kinetic friction of approximately 0.17. The conversation emphasizes the importance of verifying calculations and considering multiple solution methods.
yanase
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A skier weighing 90kg starts from rest down a hill inclined at 17 degree. He skis down the hill and then coast for 70 m along level snow until he stops. Find the coefficient of kinetic friction between the skis and the snow. What velocity does the skier have at the bottom of the hill?

Homework Equations


θ=17degree, sA=100m, sB=70m, m=90kg


The Attempt at a Solution


A-motion skis down the hill
B-motion along level snow

A:
mg sin θ - Ff = maA ------ 1 ;Ff is the frictional force
N - mg cos θ = 0
→ N = mg cos θ -------- 2

Ff = μN ----------------- 3 ; μ is coefficient of kinetic friction

3→1
mg sin θ - μN = maA ------- 4

2→4
mg sin θ - μmg cos θ = maA
aA = g(sin θ - μcos θ) ---- 5

B:
-Ff = maB ---------------- 6
down the hill
N - mg = 0 → N = mg ---- 7

3→6
-μN = maB --------------- 8

6→7
-μmg = maB
aB = -μg

using v2=u2+2as ;
u=0 since it starts from rest,
v2=2as

vA2=2aAsA
vB2=2aBsB

vA2 = vB2
2aAsA = 2aBsB
aA = -(μgsB)/sA ; aB = -μg


g(sin θ - μcos θ)= -(μgsB)/sA
μ(cos θ - sA/sB) = sin θ
μ = (sin θ)/(cos θ - sA/sB)

Substituting θ=17degree, sA=100m, sB=70m into the equation,
μ = (sin 17)/(cos 17 – 70/100)
= 1.14

The value of μ should be between 0 and 1. Can anyone tell me where I went wrong in solving this question? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apply work-energy principle.
 
Last edited:
Your work looks OK to me.
yanase said:
g(sin θ - μcos θ)= -(μgsB)/sA
μ(cos θ - sA/sB) = sin θ
μ = (sin θ)/(cos θ - sA/sB)
I think you have a typo here. That ratio should be sB/sA, not sA/sB.

Substituting θ=17degree, sA=100m, sB=70m into the equation,
μ = (sin 17)/(cos 17 – 70/100)
= 1.14
But it looks like you plugged in the correct ratios.

The value of μ should be between 0 and 1. Can anyone tell me where I went wrong in solving this question?
I don't think you went wrong. The data is just unrealistic.

Edit: I found the mistake; see my post #7. (And please look at azizlwl's alternative solution. It's always good to solve things multiple ways.)
 
Last edited:
ΔPE+ΔKE=Wf
PEi=mgh=f(x_slope)+f(x_level)
PEf=0,KEi=KEf=0
m=90kg
h=100sin17°
length on slope=100m
length on level =70m

Mg(100sin17°)=μN(x_slope)+μN(x_level)
Mg(100sin17°)=μMgCos17°(100) +μMg(70)
μ=100sin17°/(100Cos17° +70)
μ=29.23/165.63
μ=0.17
 
yanase said:
B:
-Ff = maB ---------------- 6
down the hill
N - mg = 0 → N = mg ---- 7

3→6
-μN = maB --------------- 8

6→7
-μmg = maB
aB = -μg

Deleting my comment on this.
 
Last edited:
azizlwl said:
ΔPE+ΔKE=Wf
PEi=mgh=f(x_slope)+f(x_level)
PEf=0,KEi=KEf=0
m=90kg
h=100sin17°
length on slope=100m
length on level =70m

Mg(100sin17°)=μN(x_slope)+μN(x_level)
Mg(100sin17°)=μMgCos17°(100) +μMg(70)
μ=100sin17°/(100Cos17° +70)
μ=29.23/165.63
μ=0.17
Looks good to me.

I just redid the problem using the kinematic method used in post # 1 and got the same answer.

I'll have to look to see where the error in post #1 is. Oops!

(I see the mistake... a sign error!)
 
yanase said:
using v2=u2+2as ;
u=0 since it starts from rest,
v2=2as

vA2=2aAsA
vB2=2aBsB
Careful here. For part A, the speed goes from 0 to V; but for part B the speed goes from V to 0.

So: 0 - VB2 = 2aBsB.

You have a sign error in applying the kinematic formula to the horizontal motion. Fix that and you'll get a sensible answer.

Sorry for not spotting that earlier. :redface:

Thanks to azizlwl!
 
Thank Doc Al, I'm too looking for Yanase's error which lead to wrong answer and your advice of using multiple methods.
 
Thank you very much to both of you. I really appreciate you help in solving my question. :D
 
Back
Top