#22:
The 'almost' was because of the sign. It is
opposite to that induced in AB.
#25:
No. Velocity ##\vec v## and magnetic field ##\vec B##, are both perpendicular to the resulting force ##F##.
Not what I meant. What I meant is: one doesn't want to confuse oneself unnecessarily by looking at negatively charged moving charge carriers. So if a current ##\vec I## is given, work with positive charge carriers moving in that direction.
The Lorentz force ##\ \vec F = q(\vec E + \vec v\times \vec B)\ ## works on ALL charges, negative (q<0) or positive (q>0)
(

also on neutral charges (q=0) )
Motion of charge produces a magnetic field.
Positive charges move under the influence of a Lorentz force -- if they can. In a conductor (a wire), the positive charge carriers generally are not free to move. Electrons, the negative charge carriers, can move and thereby generate an emf.
I think I understand what you are trying to say here (correct me if I miss): Lorentz force on CD pushes electrons down and positive ions up. Positive ions can't move, electrons can. They don't move without limits (they don't pile up because they repel each other, and there is a resistance)
#26: The exercise in post 1 gives a current ##I## in the long wire and asks for the current in loop ABCD; with resistance ##R## given, that is equivalent to asking for the emf divided by ##R##.
#27:
They do not. Their net charge is 0.
No. Their direction of motion is the direction of ##\vec v##. Their
orientation is perpendicular to ##\vec V##.