Find the electrostatic potential due to a hoop of charge

wam_mi
Messages
78
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



(Part 1) A hoop of charge of radius k lies in the y, z plane, centred on the x axis, so that
it occupies the points (0, y, z) with y^2 + z^2 = k^2. If the (linear) charge density
in the hoop is j, calculate the electrostatic potential Fi at all points on the
x axis, and show that, far from the hoop on the x axis, Fi (x, 0, 0) = (2*pi*j)/|x|.
Explain briefly why this result was only to be expected.

(Part 2) More generally, what do you expect the leading behaviour of Fi(r) to be, far
from the hoop? (You do not need to give any detailed calculations.) Use your
answer to deduce the limiting forms of the equipotential surfaces and field lines,
again far from the hoop.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



(Part 1)

Total Charge Q = Integrating j * dl with interval [0 , 2*pi]
= 2*pi*k*j

By Symmetry, Fi (x) = 2*pi*k*j / |x| (Is this wrong?)

And now I'm stuck for the rest of the question.

Please help! Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Integrating the charge elements and using symmetry is involved for solving this problem.

E = E_x =\int\mbox{dEcos}\theta\mbox{d}\theta

where

dE =\frac{Kd\rho}{r^2}

The sine components of E cancel due to symmetry, and

cos\theta = \frac{x}{\sqrt{k^2+x^2}}

The charge element is

d\rho = jkd\phi \ \mbox{and}\ d\phi \ \mbox{ is integrated from 0 to} \ 2\pi

Once E is found, the potential is found from integrating E from infinity to x along the x axis.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top