Find the final temperature of water

AI Thread Summary
To find the final temperature of water when 175 g of steam at 150°C loses 423 kJ of energy, the heat transfer involves both condensation and cooling phases. The calculations include the energy lost during condensation of steam to water and the cooling of water from 150°C to an unknown final temperature. It is crucial to treat all heat quantities as negative since they represent energy loss. The setup indicates that the final temperature calculation results in a value above the boiling point, suggesting that the water may not be fully in liquid form. Including units in calculations is essential for clarity and accuracy in academic settings.
jwxie
Messages
278
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the final temperature of water if 175 g steam at 150 C loses 423 KJ of energy?

Homework Equations


Q = M *C_p * Δ T
Q = m * heat of (phase_change)

The Attempt at a Solution



This is how I would go about solving this problem.

Going from steam to water requires energy of two types:
  1. Going from steam to water --> Q = m * heat of vap
  2. Cooling from 150C to 100C --> Q = m * Specific heat of steam * Δ T

Furthermore, we are told that steam is finally in the form of water, which has an unknown final temperature, so we have
Q = m * specific heat of water * ΔT

Add them together, and equates with the heat loss (which is given)

- 423KJ = Q (from steam to water) + Q (cooling from 150 to 100) + Q (cooling from 100 to unknown final temperature)

Is this correct?

If it is, my question would be: is it also correct to make Q (from steam to water) negative? I don't remember seeing heat of condensation. Can I make heat of evaporation negative in this case?

Anything else needs to be negative also?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are on the right track. All the Q's will be negative, since cooling to lower temperatures and condensing form vapor to liquid all involve loss of energy.
 
Redbelly98 said:
You are on the right track. All the Q's will be negative, since cooling to lower temperatures and condensing form vapor to liquid all involve loss of energy.

Thanks. But if all Qs are negative, unknown delta T is x = 13.6575
It is still above the boiling point though.
I thought it was safe to assume that it is no longer steam, but water, fully in liquid form.\\

Here is my setup
-423000 = (-2260 * 175g) + (-2.0 * 50 *175) + (-4.184 * 175 * x)
x = delta T = 13.6575
Hence, 150 - 13.6575.

THanks.
 
jwxie said:
I thought it was safe to assume that it is no longer steam

Apparently it was not safe :-p

-423000 = (-2260 * 175g) + (-2.0 * 50 *175) + (-4.184 * 175 * x)

I wanted to check the result, but this is as cryptic as it can be - no units, no explanation of what is what. Sorry, I am not going to take off my tin foil hat to read your mind, it is too noisy out there.
 
jwxie said:
Thanks. But if all Qs are negative, unknown delta T is x = 13.6575
It is still above the boiling point though.
I thought it was safe to assume that it is no longer steam, but water, fully in liquid form.\\

Here is my setup
-423000 = (-2260 * 175g) + (-2.0 * 50 *175) + (-4.184 * 175 * x)
x = delta T = 13.6575
Hence, 150 - 13.6575.

THanks.
Looks about right, except for one detail: earlier you (correctly) wrote:
- 423KJ = Q (from steam to water) + Q (cooling from 150 to 100) + Q (cooling from 100 to unknown final temperature)
So x is the temperature change after the water has reached 100 C.

By the way, Borek has a good point. Including units would be helpful and depending on who is grading your assignment -- or an exam you take in the future -- you might lose points by just writing down numbers without units.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top