Find the force on an object on an inclined plane

ritwik06
Messages
577
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A body is projected up an inclined plane with a speed Vo. The inclination of the incline is \theta. The surface of th incline is a tangent to a circle of radius R. Find the force acting on th object when it is at the top of the sphere provied that Vo= 2*the minimum velocity need to reach the top of the sphere.
The length of incline = L
Assume that the block does not lose contact with the track.

The Attempt at a Solution


The minimum velocity required, as I calculated was:
\sqrt{2g[R(1-cos \theta)+ L sin \theta} which was correct.
But the Force I calculated was diffrent.

At the top of the phere, the velocity will become Vo/2. Why oesnt (mV^2)/R give me the correct answer? as the body perform circular motion. Help me please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The minimum velocity required to reach the top satisfies (1/2)mv0^2=mgh (where h is the total height of the top of the sphere) - use conservation of energy. If you leave with twice that velocity your energy at the top is (1/2)m(2*v0)^2-mgh. Equate that to kinetic energy at the top and solve for velocity. You DON'T arrive with half the initial velocity.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top