Find the forces exerted by the two cables

  • Thread starter Thread starter petal5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cables Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the forces exerted by two cables supporting a beam with a mass of 1500 kg. Participants suggest using the equilibrium condition F1 + F2 = Mg and taking moments about the lower end of the beam to find the tensions in the cables. There is some confusion regarding the angles and distances used in the torque calculations, but it is clarified that the tension's distance from the pivot point is zero for F1. Ultimately, the focus shifts to calculating T2, with one participant successfully deriving T2 as approximately 13321.274 N, and they are encouraged to use this to find T1. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding torque and tension in solving the problem.
petal5
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I'd appreciate help with this problem as I don't know how to start it:

A beam with a mass of 1500 kg and a length of 2.0 m hangs from two cables,
such that it makes an angle of 65degrees with the vertical. Both of the cables are completely
vertical; one is attached at the lower end of the beam, while the other is attached
0.40 m from the higher end of the beam. (a) Find the forces exerted by the two
cables.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you any thoughts on the problem?
 
I'm thinking F1+F2=Mg but I'm not sure
 
petal5 said:
I'm thinking F1+F2=Mg but I'm not sure
That is true, and it will be useful later in the problem. How about taking moments about the lower end of the beam?
 
Sorry but what do you mean by 'talking moments'?
 
petal5 said:
Sorry but what do you mean by 'talking moments'?
Moments is equivalent to torques. Examine the torques on the beam using the lower end as the axis of rotation.
 
Thanks for your help,I really appreciate it!
Do you mean to work out the following: T1=r1f1sinx , which would be T1=(0.4m)(F1)(sin25)
 
petal5 said:
Thanks for your help,I really appreciate it!
Do you mean to work out the following: T1=r1f1sinx , which would be T1=(0.4m)(F1)(sin25)
You have the right idea, perhaps you have the benefit of the diagram, but from the text I disagree with your angle and distance. If you do have a diagram, would it be possible for you to post it on Imageshack or something similar?
 
I've had another look at it and the angle and distance I posted above are incorrect.I've now come up with T1=r1f1sin65, T1=(0m)(F1)(0.9063).This is with using the lower end to take torques.However,I'm a bit confused as F1 turns out to be 0.
For T2 I've gotten (1.6m)(F2)(0.9063) therefore T2= -(1.45)F2
(I don't have a diagram by the way!)
 
  • #10
Of course T1 should be zero since you are taking torques about this point, this is your pivot point. Your on the right track but not there yet, you need to consider both the torque due to the tension and the weight of the beam. Thus;

T_{2}\cdot (1.6)\sin(65) - (1500\cdot g)\cdot (1)\sin(65) = 0

Do you understand why?
 
  • #11
In my last post I said that F1=0 and then you replied that T1=0.Are both F1 and T1 equal to 0?
Is the formula you mentioned above the formula for F2?
 
  • #12
petal5 said:
In my last post I said that F1=0 and then you replied that T1=0.Are both F1 and T1 equal to 0?
That was poor practise from me, I apologise. You are taking torques about the base the beam, yes? Therefore, the tension is being applied through the axis of rotation, yes? Hence, the distance from the axis rotation to the applied force is zero. Does that make more sense?
petal5 said:
Is the formula you mentioned above the formula for F2?
Yes, in words the above equation is "the magnitude of the torque exerted by the tension in the second string minus the magnitude torque exerted by the weight of the beam must be zero.

Do you follow?
 
  • #13
Hootenanny said:
You are taking torques about the base the beam, yes? Therefore, the tension is being applied through the axis of rotation, yes? Hence, the distance from the axis rotation to the applied force is zero. Does that make more sense?

Ye,the above makes sense to me.However,I am still unsure as to how to work out F2
 
  • #14
petal5 said:
Ye,the above makes sense to me.However,I am still unsure as to how to work out F2
You do not need to calculate F2, you need to calculate T2, the equation for which I posted in post #10. Can you solve that for T2?
 
  • #15
But part (a) of the problem is: Find the forces exerted by the two cables.Then part (b) is:What are the torques exerted by each of the two cables and by the centre of mass of the beam about a pivot point at then lower endc of the beam.So I seem to need F2??
 
Last edited:
  • #16
petal5 said:
But part (a) of the problem is: Find the forces exerted by the two cables.Then part (b) is:What are the torques exerted by each of the two cables and by the centre of mass of the beam about a pivot point at then lower endc of the beam.So I seem to need F2??
The force exerted by the cable is the tension in the cable i.e. T2
 
  • #17
Thanks again for all your help.Filling in for the equation in post #10 I get T2= 13321.274
 
  • #18
Now, you can use your equation;
petal5 said:
I'm thinking F1+F2=Mg
To calculate T1. (I'm not checking your arithmetic though :wink:)
petal5 said:
Thanks again for all your help
My pleasure.
 
Back
Top