Find the time of a certain velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter pberardi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time Velocity
AI Thread Summary
A time-dependent force, F = 8i – 4tj N, acts on a 2.00 kg object initially at rest, raising questions about the object's speed, distance, and displacement at a speed of 15 m/s. The initial attempt to solve the problem incorrectly applied constant acceleration formulas, which do not apply due to the time-dependent nature of the force. Instead, calculus is necessary to derive the correct velocity and displacement equations. Integrating the force provides the correct velocity vector, while further integration is needed to find the displacement. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using calculus for non-constant acceleration scenarios.
pberardi
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A time-dependent force, F = 8i – 4tj N, is exerted on a 2.00 kg object initially at rest. a) At what time will the object be moving with a speed of 15 m/s? b) How far is the object from its initial position when its speed is 15 m/s? c) Through what total displacement has the object traveled at this moment?

Homework Equations


F = ma
vf = v0 + at

The Attempt at a Solution



I took the mag of the F which is sq(80) = ma so: 8.9 = 2a, therefore a should be 4.47.
Then I used vf = vo + at. It is at rest so vo = 0 so: 15 = 4.47t, t = 3.35 and it is incorrect. Can someone please tell me what I did wrong? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the force, and thus the acceleration, is time-dependent, you can't use formulas that only apply for constant acceleration. Hint: Use a bit of calculus.
 
What I did was integrate the force vector to get <8t, -2t^2> = 2a but I still have two unknowns.
 
pberardi said:
What I did was integrate the force vector to get <8t, -2t^2> = 2a but I still have two unknowns.
(You mean = 2v.) The only unknown is the time. (Find the magnitude of that velocity vector.)
 
Ok tell me if this will work: F = ma so a = F/m so a = <4, -2t>. v = <4t, -t^2> but speed is the mag of velocity so 15 = sq(16t^2 + t^4). So 225 = 16t^2 + t^4 which gives me four roots one of them being 3. Is this good?
 
Perfecto!
 
Great thanks. But now I am having a bit of trouble with the position. It is asking me for the vector here so I split it up into components.
For x I get xf = xi + vxit + 1/2(ax)t^2 which is xf = 0 + 4t(t) + (1/2)4t^2 at t = 3 gives 54
For y I get yf = yi +vyit + 1/2(ay)t^2 which is yf = 0 + (-t^2)t + (1/2)(-2t)t^2 at t = 3 is -54. They give a number for the answer so I should mag the vector and I get 76.4 but it is incorrect. Please?
 
pberardi said:
For x I get xf = xi + vxit + 1/2(ax)t^2
Same issue as before: Don't try to apply constant-acceleration formulas when the acceleration is not constant. Same advice as before: Use calculus.
 
But I have already done the calculus. I am just using the v and a that I had before and just plugging them in. I really don't understand why this doesn't work.
 
  • #10
pberardi said:
But I have already done the calculus.
You used calculus to find the velocity; now use it to find the displacement.
I am just using the v and a that I had before and just plugging them in. I really don't understand why this doesn't work.
Because the acceleration is not a constant over the interval from t = 0 to t = 3 seconds. So those kinematic formulas do not apply.
 
  • #11
I do not know any other formulas that give me a position. Could you give me a little bigger hint?
 
  • #12
Sure. Just like a = dv/dt, v = dx/dt.
 
  • #13
Thanks. Just curious. Since the kinematics do not apply, what would we do if we were given an initial velocity and an initial position?
 
  • #14
Whenever you integrate, you'll have constants of integration. The initial conditions will determine those constants.

For example, since the object is initially at rest, you know that at t = 0, v = 0. And since all we care about are displacements from the initial position, we can say that at t = 0, the object is at x = y = 0.
 
  • #15
For the first part how do you get 225 = 16t^2 + t^4?
 
  • #16
Picapichu said:
For the first part how do you get 225 = 16t^2 + t^4?
See post #5. To go from a to v, integrate.
 
Back
Top