Find Velocity: Confirm Calculation Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter goonking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on confirming the calculation of centripetal velocity using the formula F = mv²/r, where the radius is identified as 15.11m. Participants analyze the components of gravitational force, with Fgx calculated at 1398 N and Fgy at 904 N, leading to a derived velocity of 11 m/s. The conversation shifts to the importance of free body diagrams (FBD) for clarity in solving the problem, emphasizing that mass can cancel out in the equations. Ultimately, the correct centripetal velocity is confirmed to be 15.1 m/s, with suggestions for clearer presentation of calculations for better understanding and grading.
goonking
Messages
434
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


XqDbt9j.png


Homework Equations


F = m v^2 /r

The Attempt at a Solution

so find the components of the length of the rope, the X component is 15.11m and the Y component is 9.77m.

15.11 should be the radius of the circle if you look at it from above.

the components of Fg should be Fgx = 1398 N and Fgy = 904 N

Plugging into Fcentripetal = mv^2/r = 170kg x V^2 / 15.11 = 1398 N

V should equal 11 m/s.

can someone confirm if this is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
goonking said:
the components of Fg should be Fgx = 1398 N and Fgy = 904 N
What is this?
Mass actually doesn't matter, i think.
From the FBD, if you form an equation for tan##\theta## i think you'll get an answer.
 
Last edited:
I would have expected a free body diagram in there someplace myself.
 
Suraj M said:
What is this?
Fg = 9.8 x 170 kg = 1666 N

The Fgx is the force in the horizontal direction. (from the pole to the mass)

so Fgx = (Sin 57.1 ) 1666 N

is this something I need to solve the problem?
 
goonking said:
The Fgx is the force in the horizontal direction. (from the pole to the mass)
How does gravitational force have a horizontal component?
P.S check post#2, i edited it.
 
Suraj M said:
What is this?
Mass actually doesn't matter, i think.
From the FBD, if you form an equation for tan##\theta## i think you'll get an answer.
what do I use tan delta for? to find tension of the rope?

edit. ah, yes, it is to find tension. answer is 15.1 meters/s.

I have to keep in mind that we only use the X component of tension in our equation : Ftx = mv^2/r
 
Can you provide the FBD?
 
goonking said:
what do I use tan delta for? to find tension of the rope?
 
apparently, mass was required in my equation, but can you show your way that didn't require mass?
 
  • #10
If you have the FBD , i can tell you, Hint: it's not for the tension,
The angle made depends only on the velocity(and g). Please draw the FBD , everything will get sorted out.
 
  • #11
goonking said:
apparently, mass was required in my equation, but can you show your way that didn't require mass?
you didn't need it either
goonking said:
Fcentripetal = mv^2/r = 170kg x V^2 / 15.11 = 1398 N
here the mass gets canceled anyway..
 
  • #12
Suraj M said:
If you have the FBD , i can tell you, Hint: it's not for the tension,
The angle made depends only on the velocity(and g). Please draw the FBD , everything will get sorted out.
66HY2B3.png
 
  • #13
goonking said:
66HY2B3.png
using 2565 N as the X component of tension.

2565 = 170kg v^2 / 15.11m

V = 15.1 m/s
 
  • Like
Likes Suraj M
  • #14
goonking said:
2565 = 170kg v^2 / 15.11m

V = 15.1 m/s
That's exactly what i did. :)
 
  • #15
Suraj M said:
That's exactly what i did. :)
did you obtain 2565N the same way I did?

Was it correct to set FTy = Fg = 9.8 x 170kg?
 
  • #16
goonking said:
did you obtain 2565N the same way I did?
i used ##\theta##=57.1° so i got 2575N
goonking said:
Was it correct to set FTy = Fg = 9.8 x 170kg?
yes.
Its easier to do it like this$$\tan\theta = \frac{\frac{mv^2}{2}}{mg}$$
skips the steps involving tension.
 
  • #17
Suraj M said:
i used ##\theta##=57.1° so i got 2575N

yes.
Its easier to do it like this$$\tan\theta = \frac{\frac{mv^2}{2}}{mg}$$
skips the steps involving tension.
hmmm. didn't think you can set FTx = 1/2 m v^2 but I'll try to remember
 
  • #18
using 2565 N as the X component of tension.
... I think the place you'd lose marks here is that the reasoning behind how you arrived at that figure is not all that clear ... I see it's Fty.tan(θ) but why would you know to do that? What was the physics behind that decision? I cannot tell from what you wrote.

hmmm. didn't think you can set FTx = 1/2 m v^2 but I'll try to remember
... this suggests that you did not get the figure the same way that Suraj did.
Do you understand why what you did got the correct answer?

Since you put in a lot of work, I'll walk you through what I mean:

The FBD should be a blob (for the mass - label it "m") with an arrow pointing directly down labelled "mg", and arrow pointing up and to one side labelled "F_T" (tension) and a vertical dotted line, the angle between the tension and the dotted line is drawn in and labelled "theta".

It is best practice to do as much algebra as possible with variables and plug the numbers in at the end.

Using ##\sum F=ma## vertically and radially off the FBD...
(1) vertical: ##F_T\cos\theta - mg = 0##
(2) horizontal: $$F_T\sin\theta = \left[ ma_{centripetal} = \frac{mv^2}{r} = \frac{mv^2}{L\sin\theta}\right]$$ ... this gives two equations with two unknowns.

Solve for the tension force in (1)...
$$F_T = \frac{mg}{\cos\theta}$$
... then sub into (2)
$$mg\tan\theta = \frac{mv^2}{L\sin\theta} $$... solve for v (L is the length of the cables: notice how the mass cancels out?): $$v=\pm\sqrt{ gL\tan\theta\sin\theta }$$
L=18m, g=9.8N/kg, θ=57deg ... plug the numbers into the equation gives v= 15.1m/s ... well done.

What I'd like you to notice is how the above approach is easier to read and troubleshoot - it is also easier to award full marks to.
Always make it easy for the marker to give you more marks.

It is often useful (and worth bonus marks) to reflect on the result. i.e. is 15m/s a fast speed to travel?
Compare with typical road speeds where you live.
 
  • Like
Likes Suraj M
Back
Top