Finding a Closed-Form Formula for the Commutator [J_-^n, J_+^k]

VGen128
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am looking to find a closed-form formula for the following commutator
[J_{-}^{n},J_{+}^{k}]
where the operators are raising and lowering operators of the \mathfrak{su}(2) algebra for which [J_{+},J_{-}]=2J_0 and [J_{0},J_{\pm}]=\pm J_{\pm}

I've already made some progress and I obtained the following relations, which can be proved by induction :

[J_{-}^{n},J_{+}]=-2nJ_0J_{-}^{n-1}-n(n-1)J_-^{n-1}
[J_{-},J_{+}^{n}]=-2nJ_{+}^{n-1}J_0-n(n-1)J_+^{n-1}

The two last relations can be used to find a recurrence relation for the object I wish to compute, but I am hoping for a closed form formula.

Any ideas ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


VGen128 said:
Hello,

I am looking to find a closed-form formula for the following commutator
[J_{-}^{n},J_{+}^{k}]
where the operators are raising and lowering operators of the \mathfrak{su}(2) algebra for which [J_{+},J_{-}]=2J_0 and [J_{0},J_{\pm}]=\pm J_{\pm}

I've already made some progress and I obtained the following relations, which can be proved by induction :

[J_{-}^{n},J_{+}]=-2nJ_0J_{-}^{n-1}-n(n-1)J_-^{n-1}
[J_{-},J_{+}^{n}]=-2nJ_{+}^{n-1}J_0-n(n-1)J_+^{n-1}

The two last relations can be used to find a recurrence relation for the object I wish to compute, but I am hoping for a closed form formula.
Use your recurrence formula to get the next few terms, guess from these the general form of the result,
and insert it into your recurrence formula to get recurrences for the unknown coefficients. If a nice closed formula exists, these recurrences should have a simple solution.
 


Ok ! Thanks.

I will pursue this...I'll post the result if I get something.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top