Finding a continous solution to an integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter l888l888l888
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
l888l888l888
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find a continuous solution to the integral equation:
f(x)=(x^3)+(1/2)*integral from 0 to 1 of ((x*y)/(y+1))*f(y)dy, by finding a fixed point of the function v:(C([0,1]), d)-->((C([0,1]), d) defined by
v(f)(x)=(x^3)+(1/2)*integral from 0 to 1 of ((x*y)/(y+1))*f(y)dy

Homework Equations


d is the supremum norm.
d(v(f1),v(f2))=sup(x in [0,1]) |(v(f1)(x)-v(f2)(x)|<=(1/4)*sup(y in [0,1]) |f1(y)-f2(x)|

The Attempt at a Solution


it says to use maple to do calculatins. tried and failed
 
Physics news on Phys.org
l888l888l888 said:

Homework Statement


find a continuous solution to the integral equation:
f(x)=(x^3)+(1/2)*integral from 0 to 1 of ((x*y)/(y+1))*f(y)dy, by finding a fixed point of the function v:(C([0,1]), d)-->((C([0,1]), d) defined by
v(f)(x)=(x^3)+(1/2)*integral from 0 to 1 of ((x*y)/(y+1))*f(y)dy

Homework Equations


d is the supremum norm.
d(v(f1),v(f2))=sup(x in [0,1]) |(v(f1)(x)-v(f2)(x)|<=(1/4)*sup(y in [0,1]) |f1(y)-f2(x)|

The Attempt at a Solution


it says to use maple to do calculatins. tried and failed

Am I right this is complex analysis?
 
Susanne217- This would be categorized as the theory of Integral equations. Here, specifically, the theory borrows tools from the theory of Metric spaces, in particular the Banach Contraction Mapping theorem.

OP - I don't know how to use Maple, so I'm not sure how this question was intended to be solved. Though I will complain, the question could have been better worded, since saying "Find the fixed point of v(f)(x) " is exactly the same as saying "solve the integral equation".

An idea though: We know that the fixed point of v(f)(x) is the limit of the recursion f_{n+1} = v(f_n) with any initial f_0 \in C([0,1], \mathbb{C} ). I started with f_0(x) = 1. Then f_1(x) = x^3 + x(1-\log 2)/2. Repeat this a few more times, and you'll notice that the same integrals appear over and over, with only some constants changing, and we always end up having f_n (x) = x^3 + C_n x where C_n is a sequence of real constants (it's an n-th degree polynomial in log 2, but we don't need that). So then one could well conjecture that our fixed point has the form f(x) = x^3 + Cx where C is some constant. So plug this into our fixed point relation v(f) = f, and solve for the value of C which satisfies this. This gives you a fixed point, which you know is also unique, and completes the problem.
 
f(x)=x^3+Cx where C is some constant. So plug this into our fixed point relation v(f) = f, and solve for the value of C which satisfies this. This gives you a fixed point, which you know is also unique, and completes the problem.

Is this what you mean?...

1/2*integral (xy/y+1)(y^3 +Cy)dy +x^3=x^3+CX
 
Yes, it is.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top