Finding a friction force (ladder leaning against a wall )

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the friction force acting on a ladder leaning against a wall, specifically when the coefficient of friction is 1.5 times a given value. Participants highlight the relationship between static friction and the forces acting in the x-direction, emphasizing that friction must balance the horizontal forces. One user expresses frustration after exams but seeks clarification on calculating the normal force (N_1) and its relation to friction, suggesting that friction equals 1.5 times N_1 based on Newton's second law. The minimum friction force is also discussed, with a formula provided that incorporates various parameters like angles and masses. Understanding these calculations is crucial for determining the stability of the ladder.
Linus Pauling
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
1.
MTS_st_0.jpg


Suppose that the actual coefficent of friction is one and a half times as large as the value of . That is, . Under these circumstances, what is the magnitude of the force of friction that the floor applies to the ladder?
Express your answer in terms of , , , , , and . Remember to pay attention to the relation of force and .




2. static friction = magnitude of force in x direction, opposite sign



3. Ok, I had two exams today and I just almost went crazy calculating the the minimum friction force so that this ladder won't slip (brutal, but I did it). I am burnt out. How do I calculate N_1 here? It's the only force in the x direction other than friction, right? So by Newton's 2nd law the answer should just be friction = 1.5N_1, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you please tell me wha t are the know data.
 
... that picture has everything except that calculated minimum friction force, which is:

cot(theta) * (Lgm_2 + M_1gd - 0.5m_dLg * (Lgm_1 + Lgm_2)^-1
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top