Finding a function given a limit and restriction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Limit
Mustard
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Look at snippet
Relevant Equations
Look at snippet
calchelp.PNG

Not sure how to go about this. Would relying on a hole or asymptote work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mustard said:
Homework Statement:: Look at snippet
Relevant Equations:: Look at snippet

View attachment 268806
Not sure how to go about this. Would relying on a hole or asymptote work?
yes, the function need not be continuous.
 
ehild said:
yes, the function need not be continuous.
Hmmm... I was thinking of a function like f(x)= 4x-8/x-2 = 4(x-2)/x-2 = 4, that would make a hole at x=2.
But would also make f(2) = 4 ? Would it be safe to assume since there is a hole at (2,4) , it is undefined therefore f(2) does not equal 4 ?
 
Mustard said:
Hmmm... I was thinking of a function like f(x)= 4x-8/x-2 = 4(x-2)/x-2 = 4, that would make a hole at x=2.
But would also make f(2) = 4 ? Would it be safe to assume since there is a hole at (2,4) , it is undefined therefore f(2) does not equal 4 ?
The function has to be defined at x=2.
You can define it in a way everywhere except x=2, and define its value separately at x=2.
 
ehild said:
The function has to be defined at x=2.
You can define it in a way everywhere except x=2, and define its value separately at x=2.
Do you mean like a piece wise function ?
 
Mustard said:
I was thinking of a function like f(x)= 4x-8/x-2 = 4(x-2)/x-2 = 4
You need more parentheses.
4x-8/x-2 means ##4x - \frac 8 x - 2##
and 4(x-2)/x-2 means ##\frac{4(x - 2)}x - 2##
When a numerator or denominator of a fraction contains multiple terms, you need parentheses around the whole numerator or denominator, like so.
f(x)= (4x-8)/(x-2) = 4(x-2)/(x-2)
ehild said:
You can define it in a way everywhere except x=2, and define its value separately at x=2.
Mustard said:
Do you mean like a piece wise function ?
Yes.
 
I suppose you can take any function, and define another function as that one multiplied it by (x - 2) and also divided by (x - 2) - I defer to the mathematicians as to whether that is formally a bona fide new function but even if it is it looks to me trivial and cheating.

The problem says that f(2) ≠ 4 but it doesn't say it has to be equal something or be defined. Probably you have studied before functions which at some point become equal to 0/0 but you were able to find their limit at that point? So you could adapt one of those, I guess that is what the question is expecting.
 
epenguin said:
I suppose you can take any function, and define another function as that one multiplied it by (x - 2) and also divided by (x - 2) - I defer to the mathematicians as to whether that is formally a bona fide new function but even if it is it looks to me trivial and cheating.

Two functions f : A \to B and g: C \to D are equal if and only if A = C and B = D and for every a \in A we have f(a) = g(a). Thus f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} and <br /> g: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} : x \mapsto \begin{cases} \frac{(x-2)}{(x-2)}f(x) &amp; x \neq 2 \\<br /> f(2) &amp; x = 2 \end{cases} are the same function, but if g(2) is defined to be something other than f(2) then they are not. However, g is always equal to <br /> h: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} : x \mapsto \begin{cases} f(x) &amp; x \neq 2 \\<br /> g(2) &amp; x = 2 \end{cases} which is easier to write and read.

I don't think it assists anyone to characterise an obvious or straightforward example which satisfies the conditions of the question as "trivial and cheating".

epenguin said:
The problem says that f(2) ≠ 4 but it doesn't say it has to be equal something or be defined. Probably you have studied before functions which at some point become equal to 0/0 but you were able to find their limit at that point? So you could adapt one of those, I guess that is what the question is expecting.

I would say that f(2) \neq 4 means that f(2) is defined but is not 4. If a function for which f(2) was not defined but \lim_{x \to 2} f(x) = 4 was wanted, then the question would have said exactly that; and f : \mathbb{R} \setminus \{2\} \to \mathbb{R} : x \mapsto 4 would work.

(It would be nice if the question had started "Find f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} such that ...")
 
Back
Top