How Accurate Is the Maclaurin Series for \( f(x) = x^2e^{-2x^2} \)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the Maclaurin series and the 100th degree Maclaurin polynomial for the function \( f(x) = x^2 e^{-2x^2} \). The initial series presented for part (a) is correct, expressed as the infinite sum. For part (b), clarification is provided that the 100th degree polynomial should only include terms up to \( x^{100} \), leading to the correct expression being the sum from \( n=0 \) to \( n=49 \). The original post contained an error regarding the degree of the polynomial, which has since been corrected. The thread emphasizes the importance of accurately determining the degree of the polynomial in relation to the series expansion.
RadiationX
Messages
255
Reaction score
0
I need some peer review of this quesion. Let f(x)=x^2e^{-2x^2}

(a) find the maclaurin series of f

(b) find the 100th degree maclaurin polynomial of f.


for part a i have:\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-2)^nx^{2n+2}}{n!}

and for b:\sum_{n=0}^{99}\frac{(-2)^nx^{2n+2}}{n!}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
does anyone have a review for me?
 
It looks good. I'm not sure what you mean by the 100th degree MacLaurin polynomial, but if you mean the expansion up to the 100th power of x you have too many terms, since it goes up to the 2(99)+2=200th power of x.
 
Are u sure...?

What is f^{\mbox{iv}}(x)...?And then,of course,f^{\mbox{iv}}(x)...?

Daniel.
 
RadiationX said:
I need some peer review of this quesion. Let f(x)=x^2e^{-2x^2}

(a) find the maclaurin series of f

(b) find the 100th degree maclaurin polynomial of f.


for part a i have:\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-2)^nx^{2n+2}}{n!}

and for b:\sum_{n=0}^{99}\frac{(-2)^nx^{2n+2}}{n!}


This is the 100th degree maclaurin polynomial let 100=2n+2 so that n=49 now we have this:\sum_{n=0}^{49}\frac{(-2)^nx^{2n+2}}{n!}

my oginal post of part (b) was incorrect. now this is correct
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top