Finding a Particular Solution for a Non-Homogeneous PDE

roldy
Messages
206
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Find the solution of
yu_x + xu_y = (y-x)e^{x-y}

that satisfies the auxiliary condition
u(x,0) = x^4 + e^x


Homework Equations


Given in question


The Attempt at a Solution


The general solution to this is u(x,y) = f(y^2-x^2)

Applying the auxiliary condition I get
x^4 + e^x = u(x,0) = f(0^2-x^2)

This results in
x^4 + e^x = f(-x^2)

This is where I'm getting stuck. I need to "make" something on the left side that resembles what is shown in the parenthesis.

For example:
x^4 = f(-x^2)
Re-writing this would give
(-x^2)^2 = f(-x^2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
roldy said:

Homework Statement


Find the solution of
yu_x + xu_y = (y-x)e^{x-y}

that satisfies the auxiliary condition
u(x,0) = x^4 + e^x


Homework Equations


Given in question


The Attempt at a Solution


The general solution to this is u(x,y) = f(y^2-x^2)

That is apparently the general solution to the homogeneous equation. Let's call it ##u_c(x,y)##

I'm not a PDE expert, but I think what you need here is to find a particular solution ##u_p(x,y)## that solves the NH that you can add to your ##u_c(x,y)##. After that you can apply your boundary conditions to the general solution ##u(x,y)=u_c(x,y)+u_p(x,y)##. In ordinary DE you have techniques like undetermined coefficients and variation of parameters to help you with such tasks. You must have some corresponding techniques for PDE's, eh?

[Edit, Added later]: It isn't difficult to find a ##u_p(x,y)## by inspection.
 
Last edited:
I think I figured out the answer and I think what threw me off was that the professor didn't have any work regarding the particular solution.

Full solution
u(x,y) = u_p(x,y) + u_c(x,y)
u(x,y) = e^{x-y} + f(y^2-x^2)
x^4 + e^x = u(x,0) = e^{x-0} + f(0^2-x^2)
x^4 + e^x = e^x + f(-x^2)
x^4 = f(-x^2)
(-x^2)^2 = f(-x^2)

Solution is

u(x,y) = (y^2-x^2)^2
 
But that is a solution to the homogeneous equation, not the non-homogeneous equation you are given. You are close. Read my post #2 again to see the proper form for ##u##.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top