Finding a probability given joint p.d.f of the continuous random variables

nabilsaleh
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm having a trouble doing this kind of problems :S

Lets try this for example:

The joint p.d.f of the continuous random variable X and Y is:

f(x,y)= (2y+x)/8 for 0<x<2 ; 1<y<2

now we're asked to find a probability, say P(X+Y<2)

I know i have to double integrate but how do I choose my integration limits and what do I do after I finish integrating?

My Attempt at the solution is:

P(X+Y<2) = \int_ \int (2y+x)/8 = 1 = \int [y^2/8 + xy/ 8]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Inner integral of x, (0,2-y), outer integral of y (1,2).

or

Inner integral of y, (1,2-x), outer integral of x (0,1). (For x > 1, y < 1).
 
nabilsaleh said:
I'm having a trouble doing this kind of problems :S

Lets try this for example:

The joint p.d.f of the continuous random variable X and Y is:

f(x,y)= (2y+x)/8 for 0<x<2 ; 1<y<2

now we're asked to find a probability, say P(X+Y<2)

I know i have to double integrate but how do I choose my integration limits and what do I do after I finish integrating?

My Attempt at the solution is:

P(X+Y<2) = \int_ \int (2y+x)/8 = 1 = \int [y^2/8 + xy/ 8]

The trick to solving this kind of problem is to draw a picture of the relevant area. If you were in Calc III doing a double integral for area, that is what you would do to help you figure out the limits of integration. Same thing here. In Calc III if you were calculating the area of a region R you would do this integral:
\iint_R 1\,dxdy
with appropriate limits for dxdy or dydx, whichever is easier. The only difference is that instead of integrating 1 and getting area, you integrate your joint density f(x,y) over the region. In your example the appropriate region is a triangle. More interesting would be if you wanted P(X+Y<3). Do you see that in that case you would to need to break the region into two parts as a dydx integral but not as a dxdy integral? Draw a picture and see.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top