Finding Active & Reactive Power: Possible Error in Lecture

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yarnzorrr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Lecture
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a discrepancy in calculating active power (P) and reactive power (Q) from a lecture. The original calculation resulted in 200W, but participants consistently found the correct value to be 500W, based on the formula P = V*I*cos(theta) with a phase angle of 60 degrees. The use of complex numbers in calculations confirmed that P should indeed equal 500W. The lecturer acknowledged the error and emphasized the importance of verifying calculations for accuracy. This clarification aims to prevent future misunderstandings in power calculations.
Yarnzorrr
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
here is a screenshot from one of my lectures talking about how to find active power (P) and reactive power (Q)

He calculates P using 100*10 Cos (30-(-30), which I understand, though the answer he gets is 200W, but whenever I calculate it I get 500 because cos60 = 0.5 and 0.5*1000 is 500.

Just wanting to know what I'm doing wrong.
Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2012-09-18 at 5.18.48 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2012-09-18 at 5.18.48 PM.png
    29 KB · Views: 495
Engineering news on Phys.org
It does look like it should be 500.
 
Yes, its obviously 500.
Also, VA = Sqrt(Watts^2+Var^2)
1000 ~= sqrt(500^2+866^2)
 
I think it's 500

I use complex number. From the picture of the board:

V=100∠+30 deg = 100(0.866+j0.5)= 86.6+50j
I=10∠-30 deg = 10(0.866-j0.5)= 8.66-j5.

Power =Re[IV]= Re[(86.6+j50)(8.66-j5)]= 749.956-250=500.
 


Thank you for bringing this to my attention. After reviewing the lecture and your calculations, it appears that there is an error in the calculation for active power. The correct formula for active power is P = V*I*cos(theta), where V is voltage, I is current, and theta is the phase angle between the two. In this case, the phase angle is 60 degrees, not 30 degrees as shown in the lecture. Therefore, the correct calculation would be P = 1000*10*cos(60) = 500 watts.

I apologize for any confusion this may have caused and I will make sure to clarify this in future lectures. It is important to always double check calculations and formulas to ensure accuracy in scientific work. Thank you for bringing this to my attention and I hope this clarification helps.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top