Finding amplitude of a baby in cot

  • Thread starter Thread starter charmedbeauty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the frequency and amplitude of a baby bouncing in a crib modeled as a spring system. For part a, the correct frequency was determined to be approximately 1.256 Hz using the formula T=2π√(m/k). In part b, there was confusion regarding the required amplitude for the baby to lose contact with the mattress, with suggestions that it could be derived from the spring force needed to overcome the baby's weight. Participants debated whether the question required a calculation or a common-sense answer, ultimately concluding that the amplitude could be found using the formula A=(gm)/k. The conversation highlights the complexities of interpreting physics problems and the importance of clarity in problem statements.
charmedbeauty
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A baby bounces up and down in her crib. Her mass is 10.5 kg, and the crib mattress can be modeled as a light spring with force constant 654 N/m.

The baby soon learns to bounce with maximum amplitude and minimum effort by bending her knees at what frequency?

b)If she were to use the mattress as a trampoline—losing contact with it for part of each cycle—what minimum amplitude of oscillation does she require?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



for the first part I just did

T=2∏√(m/k)

and f=1/T

f= 1.256

for part b)

ω=2∏/T

T=1/f

ω=2∏(1.256)

=7.89

is this method correct for b)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method for part a) looks correct. But for part b) you have calculated the natural angular frequency of the system, but the question hasn't asked you to do this. part b) is a slightly odd question. It asks for the required amplitude of oscillation such that the baby leaves the mattress. I don't think there is enough information to find the answer to part b), was there anything else given in the question?

Edit: Oh, I think for part b) you are just supposed to give a word answer. It is a common sense answer, really. You need to think about the situation, no calculation is needed.
 
BruceW said:
Your method for part a) looks correct. But for part b) you have calculated the natural angular frequency of the system, but the question hasn't asked you to do this. part b) is a slightly odd question. It asks for the required amplitude of oscillation such that the baby leaves the mattress. I don't think there is enough information to find the answer to part b), was there anything else given in the question?

Edit: Oh, I think for part b) you are just supposed to give a word answer. It is a common sense answer, really. You need to think about the situation, no calculation is needed.

No its definitely a calculation it has a cm units marked next to it.
 
For part b), Is this actually pretty easy? Can you just find the spring displacement that would result in an initial acceleration of -9.8m/s^2 if freely released? So the baby would be accelerating downwards at a lesser rate than the cot spring... leaving the spring?
 
magin said:
For part b), Is this actually pretty easy? Can you just find the spring displacement that would result in an initial acceleration of -9.8m/s^2 if freely released? So the baby would be accelerating downwards at a lesser rate than the cot spring... leaving the spring?

you mean find the spring force necessary to overcome the weight force?
 
Yes, would this be correct?
 
magin said:
Yes, would this be correct?

no

since your asked to find amplitude not force.
 
and at a displacement of about 16cm... the spring force and baby are in equilibrium
 
I don't think I am wording myself clearly.

If the baby and the mattress were attached to each other, and you pulled the baby upwards by 16 cm and then released it, then the spring force on the baby would result in a downwards acceleration greater than g. The baby and the spring aren't attached however, so it would leave the spring. I think it is fair to think of it like this, at the peak of each oscillation, the baby and spring are momentarily stationary...
 
  • #10
magin said:
I don't think I am wording myself clearly.

If the baby and the mattress were attached to each other, and you pulled the baby upwards by 16 cm and then released it, then the spring force on the baby would result in a downwards acceleration greater than g. The baby and the spring aren't attached however, so it would leave the spring. I think it is fair to think of it like this, at the peak of each oscillation, the baby and spring are momentarily stationary...

maybe try

A=(gm)/k

that should be right
 
Back
Top