Finding an equation of a parabola given three points.

  • Thread starter Thread starter starchild75
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parabola Points
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the equation of a parabola given three points, specifically without a vertex point. Participants are exploring the general form of the parabola's equation and how to derive the coefficients from the provided points.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the general form of the parabola's equation and how to set up a system of equations based on three points. There are attempts to substitute the points into the equations to find the coefficients, with some participants expressing confusion about the process and results.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations of how to approach the problem, with some participants successfully deriving coefficients while others express frustration over inconsistent results. Guidance has been offered regarding the setup of equations and the importance of checking calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention specific points and equations from their calculus book, indicating that the problem is part of a homework assignment. There are also references to the challenges of solving systems of equations and the potential for errors in sign or calculation.

starchild75
Messages
100
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Find an equation of a parabola given three points without a vertex point.

Homework Equations



y=a(x-h)+k

The Attempt at a Solution



The parabola is upside down to I know a is negative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any thoughts about the problem? What does the general form of the equation of a parabola look like?
 
y=ax^2+bx+c
 
I don't know how to find the variables given the three points.
 
starchild75 said:
I don't know how to find the variables given the three points.
The general form will give you your method. If you have three points, then you can form three equations in general form. The unknowns will be the coefficients. You can simply solve the system of linear equations. This would be introductory level algebra.
 
if you have 3 points and you know the general equation of a parabola what could you make?
 
the 3 points are: (-2,2), (0,1), (1,-2.5)

I substituted the numbers, giving three equations.

2=4a-2b+c

1=0x^2+0b+C

-5/2=a+b+c

so c=1

-2b=-4a+1

b=(4a+1)/2


I can't get the numbers to work.


This is actually in my calculus book. chapter 1
 
I got the numbers to work. The equation in general form is 2x^2-11/2x+1. How would I convert that to standard form. What is the trick to solving these? I feel like I got lucky to get the answer.
 
To solve these you will just need to know algebra to solve a system of equations.

if instead of (0,1) you were given some other point you would go ahead and combine 2 equations into 1 hopefully eliminating an x^2 or x or c term, and then working with that one and the remaining equation try to solve for a,b,or c, and using that to solve for the other co-efficients.

to get that equation to the standard form you need to complete the square, but you first need to remove the 2 in front of x^2 first.
 
  • #10
starchild75 said:
the 3 points are: (-2,2), (0,1), (1,-2.5)

I substituted the numbers, giving three equations.

2=4a-2b+c

1=0x^2+0b+C

-5/2=a+b+c

so c=1

-2b=-4a+1

b=(4a+1)/2


I can't get the numbers to work.


This is actually in my calculus book. chapter 1
You said you had 3 equations- you've only written 2 there!
The three equations you get are:
(-2,2) 4a- 2b+ c= 2
(0, 1) c= 1
(1, -2.5) a+ b+ c= -2.5

Yes, from the second equation, you get c= 1. Putting that into the other two equations, 4a- 2b= 1 and a+ b= -3.5. Can you solve those two equations for a and b?

starchild75 said:
I got the numbers to work. The equation in general form is 2x^2-11/2x+1. How would I convert that to standard form. What is the trick to solving these? I feel like I got lucky to get the answer.
Sorry, but it's too early to feel lucky! That's not at all right. Putting a= 2, b= 11/2, c= 1 into the first equation, you get 4(2)- 2(11/2)+ 1= 2- 11+ 1= -8, not 2.

Once you do have the correct equation, if by "standard form" you mean y= a(x- h)2+ k, you get that form by completing the square.
 
  • #11
I had 3 equations.

-2=4a+2b+c
-5/2=a+b+c
1=0+0+c
 
  • #12
the solutions I got were 2, -11/2, and 1. They worked in all 3 equations.
 
  • #13
Every time I do this problem, I get different answers. I have always had trouble with these. I can handle trig easily compared to these problems. I am so frustrated.
 
  • #14
I think I switched the signs around. Now I get
2=4a-2b+c
1=0+0+c
-5/2=a+b+c

and got

a=-1
b=-5/2
c=1

Does that sound better?
 
  • #15
starchild75 said:
I think I switched the signs around. Now I get
2=4a-2b+c
1=0+0+c
-5/2=a+b+c

and got

a=-1
b=-5/2
c=1

Does that sound better?

looks good to me.
 
  • #16
If I am given the points (-6; -2), (4; -2) and (1; -8) with the equation y = 2 x^2 + bx + c, CAN I use any of the two points two simultaneously solve for b and c?

By the way I tried and get different values with different points. The only reasonable solution is if I solve the problem using the fact that x = -1 is an axis of symmetry and then use the general equation y = 2(x + 1)^2 + q. Then use the point (1; -8) to find q. Rewriting the equation gives b = 4 and c = -14.

Why don't I get the same when I solve simultaneously?
 
Last edited:
  • #17
The three points are not on the same parabola -- at least they're not consistent with being on the same parabola if it's of the form: y = 2 x2 + b x + c .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
9K