Finding Angular Velocity from Known Angular Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter The-alexandra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular Flywheel
AI Thread Summary
To find the angular velocity of a flywheel from known angular acceleration, the relationship between torque, moment of inertia, and angular acceleration is crucial. The user correctly calculates angular acceleration (α) as 2F / MR, where F is the force, M is mass, and R is radius. To determine angular velocity, one can apply kinematic equations analogous to those in linear motion, considering initial conditions and time. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these parallels in motion equations. Overall, the approach to solving the problem is on the right track.
The-alexandra
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If we only know the force Fr, Find the angular velocity of the flywheel.

Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution



in the pulleys

F=F1=F2=F3
Fr=(F Sin β)/sin (β/2)=2F cos (β/2)
F = (2 cos (β/2))/Fr

so now for the flywheel

I=1/2 MR2 ..... M=mass R=Radius
τ=RF and τ=Iα .... τ = torque α = angular acceleration

so

α = 2F / MR

could you tell me if I'm right ?? and how can I can find the angular velocity.??
thank so much for your help :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The-alexandra said:

Homework Statement



If we only know the force Fr, Find the angular velocity of the flywheel.

Homework Equations






The Attempt at a Solution



in the pulleys

F=F1=F2=F3
Fr=(F Sin β)/sin (β/2)=2F cos (β/2)
F = (2 cos (β/2))/Fr

so now for the flywheel

I=1/2 MR2 ..... M=mass R=Radius
τ=RF and τ=Iα .... τ = torque α = angular acceleration

so

α = 2F / MR

could you tell me if I'm right ?? and how can I can find the angular velocity.??
thank so much for your help :smile:

Your angular acceleration looks okay.

How does one normally find velocity given acceleration? Remember that the kinematic equations that apply to linear motion have direct parallels in angular motion.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top