Finding Area of Ring Segment to Find Electric Field of Disk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of the area of a ring segment and its implications for finding the electric field of a disk. Participants clarify that the area of a thin ring segment, represented as dA, can be approximated as (2π)(r)(dr) by visualizing it as a rectangular strip. They also discuss the relationship between this approximation and the annulus formula, noting that higher-order terms like (dr)^2 become negligible as dr approaches zero. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the derivative of area with respect to radius, leading to the conclusion that the area of the ring can be derived from the area of a circle. Overall, the thread provides insights into the mathematical reasoning behind these calculations.
member 731016
Homework Statement
A disk of radius R has a uniform surface charge density s. Calculate the electric field at a point P that lies along the central perpendicular axis of the disk and a distance x from the center of the disk
Relevant Equations
Continuous charge distribution formula
Hi!

For this problem,
1669922455444.png

Why is the area of each ring segment dA equal to (2π)(r)(dr)?

However, according to google the area of a ring segment (Annulus) is,
1669922629354.png


Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cut the thin ring and stretch it out. You get a rectangular strip of length ##2\pi r## and width ##dr##. What is its area?

The area of the annulus is indeed what google says. Note that
##R^2-r^2=(R+r)(R-r)##
For a thin ring ##R## and ##r## are very close to each other so that ##R-r=dr##. You can then approximate ##R+r\approx 2r## so that ##R^2-r^2\approx 2rdr##.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
kuruman said:
Cut the thin ring and stretch it out. You get a rectangular strip of length ##2\pi r## and width ##dr##. What is its area?
Thanks! So that is thought process that gives the area! However, why is that not equal to the area from the Annulus formula?

From the annulus formula I got A = (π)[(r + dr)^2 - r^2].

Many thanks!
 
Callumnc1 said:
Thanks! So that is thought process that gives the area! However, why is that not equal to the area from the Annulus formula?

From the annulus formula I got A = (π)[(r + dr)^2 - r^2].

Many thanks!
See my edited post.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
kuruman said:
See my edited post.
Thank you, I have written up and realized I had a new question:
1669924710925.png

What if we choose not to approximate? How would we integrate the infinitesimal (dr)^2 term?

Many thanks!
 
Callumnc1 said:
Thank you, I have written up and realized I had a new question:
View attachment 318038
What if we choose not to approximate? How would we integrate the infinitesimal (dr)^2 term?

Many thanks!
Well, you will notice that if you integrate

$$\int dA = 2\pi \int_{r}^{R} r~dr $$

That it is exactly:

$$ A = \pi \left( R^2 - r^2 \right)$$

So the term ##(dr)^2## is not contributing anything. In the limit as ##dr \to 0 , 2 r ~dr ## is exact.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
erobz said:
Well, you will notice that if you integrate

$$\int dA = 2\pi \int_{r}^{R} r~dr $$

That it is exactly:

$$ A = \pi \left( R^2 - r^2 \right)$$

So the term ##(dr)^2## is not contributing anything. In the limit as ##dr \to 0 , 2 r ~dr ## is exact.
Thanks for your reply!

I guess as dr approaches zero then (dr)^2 approach's zero a lot faster than 2r dr because it is squared.

However, just curious had would you integrate the (dr)^2 term anyway?

Many thanks!
 
Callumnc1 said:
However, just curious had would you integrate the (dr)^2 term anyway?
I don't believe you ever would. It doesn't follow from the definition of the derivative.

$$ (A + \Delta A)- A = \pi \left[ \left( r + \Delta r \right)^2 - r^2\right] \implies \Delta A = \pi \left[ 2 r ~\Delta r + (\Delta r)^2 \right] $$

The derivative is given by:

$$ \frac{dA}{dr} = \lim_{ \Delta r \to 0 } \frac{\Delta A}{ \Delta r} = \lim_{ \Delta r \to 0 } \frac{ \pi \left[ 2 r ~\Delta r + (\Delta r)^2 \right] }{ \Delta r} = \lim_{ \Delta r \to 0 } \pi [ 2r + \cancel{ (\Delta r)}^0 ] = 2 \pi r $$

So if there are any first order ( or higher ) ##\Delta r ## terms left hanging around they vanish in the limit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes member 731016
erobz said:
I don't believe you ever would. It doesn't follow from the definition of the derivative.

$$ (A + \Delta A)- A = \pi \left[ \left( r + \Delta r \right)^2 - r^2\right] \implies \Delta A = \pi \left[ 2 r ~\Delta r + (\Delta r)^2 \right] $$

The derivative is given by:

$$ \frac{dA}{dr} = \lim_{ \Delta r \to 0 } \frac{\Delta A}{ \Delta r} = \lim_{ \Delta r \to 0 } \frac{ \pi \left[ 2 r ~\Delta r + (\Delta r)^2 \right] }{ \Delta r} = \lim_{ \Delta r \to 0 } \pi [ 2r + \cancel{ (\Delta r)}^0 ] = 2 \pi r $$
Ok thank you erobz!
 
  • #10
If you don't want to see these higher order terms in dr or ##\Delta r##, you can just start from the area of a circle, ##A(r)=\pi r^2## as a function of r. Then the change in the area when the radius increases by dr is the differential ##dA= (\frac{dA}{dr}) dr## = ##2\pi r dr##. This is the area of the ring added to the circle by a change in radius of dr so it is the area of a differential ring. You can use the same method to find the volume of a spherical shell by starting with the volume of a sphere.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
  • #11
nasu said:
If you don't want to see these higher order terms in dr or ##\Delta r##, you can just start from the area of a circle, ##A(r)=\pi r^2## as a function of r. Then the change in the area when the radius increases by dr is the differential ##dA= (\frac{dA}{dr}) dr## = ##2\pi r dr##. This is the area of the ring added to the circle by a change in radius of dr so it is the area of a differential ring. You can use the same method to find the volume of a spherical shell by starting with the volume of a sphere.
Thank you for sharing with me that really interesting method @nasu !
 
Back
Top