Finding Brewster's Angle via Fresnel Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the correct Fresnel Equation to derive Brewster's angle, which is expressed as tan(θ) = n2/n1. Participants clarify that using Snell's Law, where θ1 + θ2 = 90 degrees, is essential in the calculations. The reflection coefficient R_p must be set to zero to find Brewster's angle, leading to the conclusion that n1*sin(θ1) = n2*cos(θ1). The final derivation confirms that tan(θB) equals n2/n1. The procedure outlined is validated as correct for solving the problem.
876d34f
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem about this is, which Fresnel Equation am I supposed to use?

Show that the brewster's angle is

\tan(\theta)=\frac{n_{2}}{n_{1}}

but which Fresnel equation do you use

Problem: Using the correct Fresnel Equation using (plugging in) the transmitted angle \theta_{2}

Homework Equations



I figured, If I know the correct Fresnel equation, I would be able to just set my other angle equal to 90 and then I would be able to just solve for \theta and then it would yield \tan of \theta_{2} using Snell's Formula

show or rather derive the Brewster's angle

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can someone just please verify if this is the correct procedure?

so this is what I wrote on my paper

\frac{\tan(\Theta_{1}-\Theta_{2})}{\tan(\Theta_{1}+\Theta_{2})}

\Theta_{1}+\Theta_{2}=90 Degrees

Using Snell's Law then yields n_{1}\sin(\theta_{1})=n_{2}\sin(\theta_{2})

and then that yields plugging in for \Theta_{2}=90-\Theta_{1}

yields the Brewster's Angle formula by setting R_{p} equal to 0 which is the Reflection Coefficient?

and since \sin(\theta_{2})=\sin(90-\theta_{1})=\cos(\Theta_{1})

Makes it n_{1}\sin(\Theta_{1})=n_{2}\cos(\Theta_{1})

solving for the \Theta value yields

\frac{\sin(\Theta_{1})}{cos(\Theta_{1})}=\frac{n_{2}}{n_{1}}=\tan(\Theta_{B})

Which is just equal to \tan(\Theta_{B})
 
Last edited:
Welcome to Physics Forums.

I didn't follow all your details, but your final answer and starting arguments (θ1 + θ2 = 90o, Snell's Law) are correct.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top