Finding charge given the electric field at origin is zero

Click For Summary
To achieve a net electric field of zero at the origin with a -4 nC charge located at y=0.60m, the charge q2 must be positive and have a magnitude of 1.6x10-8 Coulombs. The electric field from q1 points upwards, so q2 must create a downward field to cancel it out. The calculations initially suggested a positive value for q2, but the correct interpretation of the charge's sign is crucial. Visualizing the scenario with a diagram can clarify the direction of electric fields and help avoid algebraic errors. Understanding the geometric factors and charge interactions is essential for solving such problems accurately.
paulie
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given that we have q1 = -4nC on the y-axis at y=0.60m. q2 on the y-axis at y= -1.20m. What must be the sign and magnitude of q2 be for the net electric field at the origin to be:
a. Zero
b. 50 N/C

Homework Equations


E=KQ/R2

The Attempt at a Solution


I used: ET = E1 + E2

Since ET = 0 ; rearranging the equation: E1 = - E2

Both K can be canceled out leaving us with: Q1 / R12 = - Q2 / R22

Then, Q2 = - Q1 (R22) / R12

Substituting the values: Q2 = - (-4x10-9)(1.20m)2 / (0.60m)2

Equals 1.6x10-8 Coulombs, but in my test, my prof corrected and added negative sign on the answer. Am I doing something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With charges and their fields it can be tricky accounting for all the signs and geometric factors affecting the relative field directions. Getting it right strictly by the algebra is tedious and error prone. A better approach is to make a diagram of the scenario and sketch in the charge locations and the field vectors for the positions of interest. In that way it is a simple matter to see by inspection what the charge signs need to be.

In this problem you have a -4 nC charge on the positive y-axis, so you know that at the origin its field vector will be "upwards", pointing along the positive y-axis towards that charge. In order for the net field at the origin to be zero, whatever charge you place below the x-axis must result in a field that opposes that. That should tell you the charge's sign right away.
 
  • Like
Likes paulie
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K