Finding charge given the electric field at origin is zero

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the required sign and magnitude of charge q2, positioned on the y-axis, to achieve a net electric field of zero at the origin, given a charge q1 of -4 nC located at y = 0.60 m. The solution involves using the equation E = KQ/R² and the principle that the total electric field ET must equal zero. The correct magnitude of q2 is calculated to be -1.6 x 10-8 Coulombs, indicating that q2 must be negative to counteract the positive direction of the electric field created by q1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and Coulomb's law
  • Familiarity with the concept of superposition of electric fields
  • Knowledge of vector addition in physics
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations involving electric charges
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electric field vector diagrams
  • Learn about the superposition principle in electrostatics
  • Explore the effects of charge placement on electric field strength
  • Investigate the relationship between charge magnitude and electric field intensity
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone studying electrostatics, particularly those interested in charge interactions and electric field calculations.

paulie
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given that we have q1 = -4nC on the y-axis at y=0.60m. q2 on the y-axis at y= -1.20m. What must be the sign and magnitude of q2 be for the net electric field at the origin to be:
a. Zero
b. 50 N/C

Homework Equations


E=KQ/R2

The Attempt at a Solution


I used: ET = E1 + E2

Since ET = 0 ; rearranging the equation: E1 = - E2

Both K can be canceled out leaving us with: Q1 / R12 = - Q2 / R22

Then, Q2 = - Q1 (R22) / R12

Substituting the values: Q2 = - (-4x10-9)(1.20m)2 / (0.60m)2

Equals 1.6x10-8 Coulombs, but in my test, my prof corrected and added negative sign on the answer. Am I doing something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With charges and their fields it can be tricky accounting for all the signs and geometric factors affecting the relative field directions. Getting it right strictly by the algebra is tedious and error prone. A better approach is to make a diagram of the scenario and sketch in the charge locations and the field vectors for the positions of interest. In that way it is a simple matter to see by inspection what the charge signs need to be.

In this problem you have a -4 nC charge on the positive y-axis, so you know that at the origin its field vector will be "upwards", pointing along the positive y-axis towards that charge. In order for the net field at the origin to be zero, whatever charge you place below the x-axis must result in a field that opposes that. That should tell you the charge's sign right away.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulie

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K