Finding Critical Points of a multivariable function

arisachu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm supposed to find (and classify, which I'm really not sure what that means) critical points of f(x,y) = x2y- x2 - 2y2 - 2x4 - 3y4


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I found the partial derivatives,
fx(x,y) = 2xy - 2x - 8x3
and
fy(x,y) = x2 - 4y - 12y3

I gather that x = 0 and x = sqrt(y-1/4)
I can't figure out how to solve for y, if I'm even supposed to.
I was under the impression to set both equations to 0 and solve, but I don't know if I am correct.
I guess my [STRIKE]main[/STRIKE] only question is if I am supposed to take the y solution and use it in the x? I want to solve it 100% on my own, so I only want broad answers, if that makes any sense?

Thanks to anyone who can help me! :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi arisachu! :smile:

arisachu said:

Homework Statement


I'm supposed to find (and classify, which I'm really not sure what that means) critical points of f(x,y) = x2y- x2 - 2y2 - 2x4 - 3y4


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I found the partial derivatives,
fx(x,y) = 2xy - 2x - 8x3
and
fy(x,y) = x2 - 4y - 12y3

I gather that x = 0 and x = sqrt(y-1/4)
I can't figure out how to solve for y, if I'm even supposed to.
I was under the impression to set both equations to 0 and solve, but I don't know if I am correct.
I guess my [STRIKE]main[/STRIKE] only question is if I am supposed to take the y solution and use it in the x? I want to solve it 100% on my own, so I only want broad answers, if that makes any sense?

Thanks to anyone who can help me! :)

You'll need to know when fx and fy simultaniously become 0. So you'll need to solve the system

\left\{\begin{array}{c} f_x(x,y)=0\\ f_y(x,y)=0\\ \end{array}\right.

Thus

\left\{\begin{array}{c} 2xy - 2x - 8x^3=0\\ x^2 - 4y - 12y^3=0\\ \end{array}\right.

From your first equation, you have correctly deduced that x=0 or

x=\sqrt{\frac{y-1}{4}}

Now, what does that give you when you plug that in the second equation?
 
Thanks for you reply and help! :D

Ohhh, so it's as simple as that? :O
And then I solve for [STRIKE]x[/STRIKE] y from that? :)
 
Yes, solve for y in the second equation, and then you can solve for x.
 
micromass said:
Yes, solve for y in the second equation, and then you can solve for x.

Gosh, I had been thinking you solve for y in the second equation without the first equation's x, and then set those two solutions equal to each other and I couldn't for the life of me figure it out!
You're a life (and sanity haha) saver! Thank you so much! :smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top