Finding Current after 50s Capacitors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the current after 50 seconds for a capacitor using the time constant formula. The user correctly calculated the time constant as 5 seconds but struggled with the arithmetic in determining the current after 50 seconds. The suggested approach involves recognizing that after more than 14 half-lives, the current should decrease significantly, indicating a calculation error. Additionally, using the exponential base e for calculations can simplify the process, leading to a more accurate result. The user acknowledges the mistake and expresses gratitude for the guidance.
Googl
Messages
111
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I have managed to calculate the first part of the question but the second part b I keep getting wrong. I was wondering whether you might give me some guidance. I am trying to find the current after 50s in part b below.


Homework Equations


time constant = RC


The Attempt at a Solution




a) Time constant = RC = (50 x 10-6 F) x (100, 000Ω)
Time constant = (5 x 10-5 F) x (100, 000Ω)
Time constant = 5s Correct

b) T1/2 = 5 x In 2 = 3.4657...
50 seconds corresponds to 50/3.4657 = 14.41 half-times.
Δ changing current 14.41t1/2 = 90µA/2^14.41 = 4.13 x 10^-3 µA = 4.13 x 10^-6A
Current after 50 seconds is 4.13 x 10^-6A

This is wrong. Help. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your setup looks okay to me, but the arithmetic in your last step is wrong. Try the last calculation again.

A couple of miscellaneous pointers:

1. A handy number to remember is that 10 half-lives corresponds to a decrease of about 1000 (actually 1024). So after more than 14 half-lives, we expect a decrease by a factor of about 10,000. Thus we can see that your answer is much too large; it's about 1/20 of the initial current, not 1/10,000! Quick estimates like this are very useful for finding calculation mistakes.

2. To cut down on calculation, you can use the number e as an exponential base instead of 2. The time-constant RC is actually the "1/e-life" (as opposed to the 1/2-life). So once you calculate RC, you don't need to translate into half-lives, you can just get the answer immediately. Numerically, e = 2.718... but your calculator may have a button labeled "e^"

In this case, RC = 5, so we have,

I (50s) = (90)e^(-50/5) = (90)e^(-10)

And you're done.
 
50/3.4657 is 14.427
 
Thanks a lot.

I cannot believe I missed that.
 
Googl said:
Thanks a lot.

I cannot believe I missed that.

Also, a µA is 10^(-6) A, not 10^(-3) A
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top