Finding current in circuit using Kirchoff's Rules

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using Kirchhoff's Rules to analyze a circuit with four loops. The participant initially derives four equations but encounters a row of zeroes when attempting to solve them, indicating a lack of independent equations. It is clarified that only three of the four loops are independent, necessitating an additional equation from a junction. The conversation also confirms that the current can be equated on either side of a battery due to the conservation of charge. Overall, the key takeaway is the importance of identifying independent loops and junctions in circuit analysis.
Zorba
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[URL]http://img25.imageshack.us/i/circuitj.jpg[/URL]
(Image won't show up, here's the link http://img25.imageshack.us/i/circuitj.jpg/)

Homework Equations


Kirchoff's Junction & Potential rules.

The Attempt at a Solution


[URL]http://img29.imageshack.us/i/circuit2.jpg[/URL]
(Image won't show up, here's the link http://img29.imageshack.us/i/circuit2.jpg/)
Equations I get are:
(Loop1) -7I_2+4I_3 = 5
(Loop2) -4I_2 - 2I_2 +2I_3 - 2I_4 = 8
(Loop3) -6I_2 + 7.5I_3 - 2I_4 = 8
(Loop4) -3I_2 - 4I_1 - 1.5I_3 = 5

I made a matrix out of these then and row reduce them but, I don't have enough equations becuase I get a row of zeroes... which doesn't make sense to me, 4 equations, 4 unknowns and I don't see why applying Kirchoffs rules would make me end up with something like that... so I need to get another equation, but I was wondering if I've done wrong with the equations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Zorba said:
I made a matrix out of these then and row reduce them but, I don't have enough equations becuase I get a row of zeroes... which doesn't make sense to me, 4 equations, 4 unknowns and I don't see why applying Kirchoffs rules would make me end up with something like that... so I need to get another equation, but I was wondering if I've done wrong with the equations.

Hi Zorba! :smile:

There are 4 loops in your circuit, but only 3 of them are independent

so inevitably Kirchhoff (note the extra "h" :wink:) for one will be a linear sum of the others, which eventually reduces the matrix to zero! :biggrin:

Hint: yes you do need an extra equation, and you can get it from one of the junctions. :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Zorba! :smile:

There are 4 loops in your circuit, but only 3 of them are independent

so inevitably Kirchhoff (note the extra "h" :wink:) for one will be a linear sum of the others, which eventually reduces the matrix to zero! :biggrin:

Hint: yes you do need an extra equation, and you can get it from one of the junctions. :wink:

Thanks, makes sense.

One last question, the current on either side of the batteries, can I equate them? Or can I only do this when there is only one battery in the circuit.
 
Zorba said:
One last question, the current on either side of the batteries, can I equate them? Or can I only do this when there is only one battery in the circuit.

Hi Zorba! :smile:

Yes, you can do this across any component …

basically it's because of conservation of charge … like water, the amount flowing in must equal the amount flowing out …

in terms of Kirchhoff's Rules you can look at a battery as a junction, with only two lines … the total current in those two lines must be the same! :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top