Finding current of a revolving charged cylinder

hangainlover
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When given Q, ω, and geometry of a cylinder (radius a, length L)
how do you come up with current I*n ? the cylinder is rotating around the axis through the center of the cylinder

this question is essentially the same as finding magnetic field for a solenoid...
I just need to find what is equivalent to I*n in the B equation below...

IT's originally purcell 6.18...but i understand the question except how you come up with I*n (current times the number of turns for solenoid)


Homework Equations


B=(4pi/c)*(I*n)


The Attempt at a Solution


I thought Qω/(2pi) gives you the current..
I found the charge density Q/(2pi*a*L) multiplied it by L (because we want to find the flux of charge through a trip running parallel to the cylinder).
Then, multiplied it by the velocity (ω*a) which gives me Qω(2pi)..
However the answer says it has to be Qω/L ...

here is the solution i found...
http://www.6911norfolk.com/d0lbln/h7bs99/h7bs99-psoln9.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hangainlover said:
I thought Qω/(2pi) gives you the current..

It does.
However the answer says it has to be Qω/L ...

It says the answer has to be Qv/L, where v is frequency. Since ω=2pi*f, this is identical to your formula.
 
But even then, my answer has an extra factor of L...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top