Finding Dimensions for Period of a Planet

AI Thread Summary
Kepler's third law connects a planet's orbital period to its radius, gravitational constant, and the Sun's mass. The user attempts to derive the correct dimensions for the period using the equation T = C * r^a * M^b * G^c. After manipulating the exponents, they find c = -1/2, a = 3/2, and b = -1/2, leading to T = C * r^(3/2) * M^(-1/2) * G^(-1/2). The user is confused about how to simplify this to match the expected answer of C = sqrt(GM) * r^(3/2) and seeks clarification on the removal of T and the sign changes in the exponents. The discussion highlights the challenges in dimensional analysis and the application of Kepler's law.
clark1089
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi! This is from Physics for Scientists and Engineers, Vol. 6 by Tipler and Mosca.

44. Kepler's third law relates the period of a planet to its orbital radius r, the constant G in Newton's law of gravitation, and the mass of the Sun Ms . What combination of these factors gives the correct dimensions for the period of a planet?

Homework Equations


F = Gm1m2/r2
G = [L3/MT2]
T=C*ra*Mb*Gc

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm trying to solve for C in the final equation given.

The big problem I'm having here comes after solving for the exponents in the third equation there...

[T] = [L]a[M]b[[L3/MT2]c

Next I distribute exponents and combine the like terms...

[T] = La+3cMb-cT-2c

Okay, now I solve for C using the T1 on the left side of the equation...

-2c = 1
c = -1/2

Now I have C, the other variables come to me... eheAHEUAEU

a+3(-1/2) = 0
b-c = 0
a = 3/2
b = -1/2

With the exponents solved for, I return to my original equation:

T=C*ra*Mb*Gc

Only now, I sub them in.

T=C*r3/2*M-1/2*G-1/2

THIS is where I have a problem! :( The answer given to this set was C = sqrt(GM)*r3/2.

Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong? I don't see how T gets removed or why the negative squareroots become positive while the 3/2 remains the same

ANY HELP IS APPRECIATED ! :( So stuck :(
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Made a mistake with T^(-2a).. it's actually T^(-2c)! Fixed that mistake. Sorry :X

Still need help though... :(
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top