Finding dimensions of a rectangle.

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves finding the dimensions of a rectangle with a perimeter of 24 ft, where the length is 4 ft longer than the width. The width is represented as x, and the length as x + 4. The solution shows that by setting up the equation 2x + 2(x + 4) = 24, the width is calculated to be 4 ft and the length 8 ft. There is a discussion about different methods of solving the problem, emphasizing that any correct method is valid. Overall, the calculations confirm that the dimensions align with the given conditions of the rectangle.
rcmango
Messages
232
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



the perimeter of a rectangle is 24 ft. the length is 4 ft longer than the width find the dimensions

width x
length x+4

however, I should be doing it like this:

a first equation should start like: 2x+2y=?

and the second should start like x=y+?

so what's the length and the width?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



x + x + (x+4)+(x+4) = 24
4x+8=24
-8 -8

4x = 16
4x/4 = 16/4

x = 4

so width 4 ft
and length 4+4, so 8 ft.
makes sense, since length should be greater than width.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x + x + (x+4)+(x+4) = 24

x = 4

exactly
 
rcmango said:

Homework Statement



the perimeter of a rectangle is 24 ft. the length is 4 ft longer than the width find the dimensions

width x
length x+4

however, I should be doing it like this:

a first equation should start like: 2x+2y=?

and the second should start like x=y+?

so what's the length and the width?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



x + x + (x+4)+(x+4) = 24
4x+8=24
-8 -8

4x = 16
4x/4 = 16/4

x = 4

so width 4 ft
and length 4+4, so 8 ft.
makes sense, since length should be greater than width.

Why do you say you "should be doing it like this:"? There is no *should*---any correct method is OK. Doing it two ways might be helpful towards learning goals, but it is not necessary for correct presentation of the solution.
 
If you've learned one way of solving problems of this kind, and you're expected to show that you have, in fact, understood the technique, then you probably should be doing just what you are, namely translating the facts bit by bit into equations, i.e.
  • "rectangle" suggests the equation 2x + 2y = 24
  • "width versus height" remark means y = x + 4
If you're just interested in the answer, any method will do, for instance this one, which I'll call "guess and revise":

Start with any width you like, say 7. Then the length will be 4 more, so 11. This gives you a perimeter of 7+7+11+11 = 36.

Oops, that's 12 too much. Let's subtract this "extra" length from the four sides, taking 12/4 = 3 away from each: width now is 7-3 = 4, and length is 11-3 = 8.
 
thankyou phinds for confirming.

Thanks for completing those equations Michael Redei, i seen them done that way and I didn't understand it, its much more clear now.
 
Last edited:
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top