Finding distance -- Find the height of an object given ratio of two distances

  • Thread starter Thread starter D.Man Hazarika
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Ratio
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving the height of a dropped object based on the ratio of distances traveled over time. The user attempts to derive the height H using kinematic equations but encounters algebraic errors and confusion about the variable n. Key points include the need to correctly apply the ratio of distances and clarify the meaning of n in the context of the problem. Participants emphasize the importance of accurate algebra and using the given ratio effectively to progress in the solution. The conversation highlights the challenges in understanding and applying physics concepts in problem-solving.
D.Man Hazarika
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A body is dropped from certain height H. If the ratio of the distances traveled by it in (n-3) seconds to (n-3)rd second is 4:3, find H (take g= 10 m/s²) (answer: 125m)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I did this way but I came to a dead end...
To find H,
s= 1/2 gt²
= 1/2 * 10 * (n-3)²
= 5*(n²-9)
= 5n²+45...(I)

S nth = u+g/2(2n-1)
= 5(2n-1)
= 10n-5...(II)
equating (I) AND (2)
5n²+45= 4
________ ___

10n-5. 3

=> 3(5n²+45)=4(10n-5)
=> 15n²+135=40n-20
=> 15n²-40n=-20-135
=> 15n²-40n=-155
=> 15n²+155=40n
=> 15n²+155= 40
____________
n

This is a dead end...what should I do next...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem statement looks incomplete. What is n? Is n the number of seconds required to fall the distance H?

Ok, you need to check your algebra a bit. (n-3)^2 is not (n^2 - 9). And 5 (n^2-9) is not 5n^2 + 45. And what are (I) and (II) and why should they be equal?

Also, you need to be using the ratio you have been given. The distance in n-3 seconds is 4/3 the distance in the (n-3)rd second.
 
  • Like
Likes D.Man Hazarika
Thanks...rechecking my algebra
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top