Finding E Field at Point from non uniform charge density

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at point P(0,0,4) due to a non-uniform charge density along the z-axis, given by 10|z| (nC/m). Participants clarify the correct expression for the position vector R, emphasizing that it should vary with z, leading to R = (4 - z)az. The initial misunderstanding about the absolute value of z is resolved, confirming that R should differ for z = +2 and z = -2. Ultimately, the correct electric field value is determined to be E = 34.20 az (V/m). The conversation highlights the importance of accurately defining vectors in electrostatic calculations.
fmpak93
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1. Portion of z-axis for which |z| < 2 carries a non uniform charge density of 10|z| (nC/m). Using cylindrical coordinates, determine E in free space at P(0,0,4). Explicitly show your integration.

Homework Equations


E = (1/4πε0) ∫ dQ*aR/(R2)

The Attempt at a Solution


https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t34.0-12/11004892_945246908827650_417954135_n.jpg?oh=d538ef93ebc53d426c29d8a2f0116327&oe=54ECD699&__gda__=1424795396_496617364f01c6d9bac875a291ef70af
I don't know what I'm doing wrong. the linear charge lies on the z axis and the point of interest lies on (0,0,4) so only the z unit vector applies right? As shown in the paper, the real answer is E = 34.20 az (V/m).
I
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Everything looks good except for your expression for ##\vec{R}##. Try evaluating your expression for z = +2 and z = -2. Does it make sense?
 
TSny said:
Welcome to PF!

Everything looks good except for your expression for ##\vec{R}##. Try evaluating your expression for z = +2 and z = -2. Does it make sense?

I would assume the R vector we can find as the difference in points between the source and destination. So our destination point is P(0,0,4), and our source charge point would have to be (0,0,|z|). Thus making our vector R = (4-|z|)az. Is this correct?
 
fmpak93 said:
Thus making our vector R = (4-|z|)az. Is this correct?

No. Should R be the same for z = +2 and z = -2?
 
TSny said:
No. Should R be the same for z = +2 and z = -2?

Oh I see, it shouldn't. The absolute factor only applies to the charge density, the length of the position vector will still vary from top to bottom like always. So then just R = (4-z)?
 
TSny said:
No. Should R be the same for z = +2 and z = -2?

Never-mind, you were right. I got the answer. THANKS! :)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top